Action summary

Company

株式会社大和興業Japanese original

Original: 株式会社大和興業

Corporate Number: 1500002013659

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

22 December 2021

Issuing authority

Ehime Prefecture

愛媛県

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

Daiwa Kogyo Co., Ltd. contracted seven construction projects with Ehime Prefecture. For these projects, the contract amounts exceeded the threshold specified in Article 27, Paragraph 1 of the Enforcement Order of the Construction Business Act, requiring the appointment of a dedicated chief engineer. Instead, the company assigned a dedicated technical staff from its sales office as the chief engineer for these projects. This action violated Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Construction Business Act. The prefecture issued an instruction under Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Act, requiring the company to promptly inform its staff of the violation, improve its internal management system to ensure proper appointment of technical personnel, and report the measures taken in writing.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

愛媛県西宇和郡伊方町

Representative

佐藤 文一

Permit / registration number

愛媛県知事（般-30）第9771号

Permitted business types

Plastering works, Pipe works, Sheet-metal works, Painting works, Waterproofing works, Interior finishing works, Machinery and equipment installation works, Thermal insulation works, Fittings works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第1項

Cause of action

株式会社大和興業は、愛媛県と契約締結した７件の工事において、請負代金の額が建設業法施行令第27条第１項で定める金額以上であったため、主任技術者を専任で配置すべきところ、営業所の専任技術者を当該工事の主任技術者として配置した。 このことは、建設業法第26条第３項に違反する。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=418

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "2370515c-442b-427a-b51d-aa53cc4e1b39",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-da-he-xing-ye-20211222",
    "company_name_original": "株式会社大和興業",
    "company_name_registry": "株式会社大和興業",
    "corporate_number": "1500002013659",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "愛媛県",
      "en": "Ehime Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-da-he-xing-ye-20211222",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=418",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T01:30:28.308+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:01:05.735+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T15:09:25.346Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.