Action summary

Company

ＡＫＲ建設Japanese only

Original: ＡＫＲ建設

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

17 May 2023

Issuing authority

Osaka Prefecture

大阪府

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

AKR Construction was instructed by Osaka Prefecture under the Construction Business Act, Article 28, Paragraph 1, for failing to comply with regulations regarding the maintenance of a dedicated technical officer at its Osaka City office. The company’s office had minimal utility costs (~400 yen/month), indicating limited use, and the technical officer did not regularly attend the office or perform duties there for a certain period. This situation was not disclosed to clients for construction projects ordered by Osaka City and Osaka Prefecture. The company violated the requirement that the dedicated technical officer should be present and engaged at the office full-time, as stipulated in Construction Business Act, Article 7, Paragraph 2. The prefecture’s directive emphasizes strict adherence to laws and measures to prevent recurrence.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

大阪府大阪市住吉区南住吉１－９－１９－１０８

Representative

坂根 朝親

Permit / registration number

大阪府知事（般－29）第129463号

Permitted business types

Building works, Carpentry works, Roof works, Tile, brick, and block works, Interior finishing works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第１項柱書

Cause of action

当該建設業者は、大阪市内の営業所の電気使用料金が毎月400円程度であるなど、営業所をほとんど使用せず、建設業法第７条第２号に規定する営業所の専任技術者である当該建設業者が、一定期間、当該営業所に出勤せず、当該営業所において専らその職務に従事していない状態にあった。 そして、このような状態にあることを当該建設業者が請け負った大阪市発注工事及び泉佐野市内の大阪府発注工事において、注文者に伝えていなかった。 このように、建設業法第７条第２号に規定する営業所における専任技術者である当該建設業者がその営業所に常勤して専らその職務に従事すべきところ、同号の規定に違反して、一定期間、専任しているとは認めがたい状態にあった。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=873

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "525dfd99-b9a5-4dfe-9071-3d6373b1fa73",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-akrjian-she-20230517",
    "company_name_original": "ＡＫＲ建設",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "大阪府",
      "en": "Osaka Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 65,
    "method": "loose_name_without_strong_address_evidence",
    "method_label": "loose_name_without_strong_address_evidence",
    "notes": "公表資料の名称は収録しましたが、法人番号へ安全に結び付ける独立証拠が不足しています。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-akrjian-she-20230517",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=873",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T15:00:20.029+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:51:51.018+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-11T04:38:22.610Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.