Enforcement record

認証取消 disclosure naming 玉井車輌有限会社

玉井車輌有限会社 (Road Transport Vehicle Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Road Transport Vehicle ActKanto District Transport BureauGovernment disclosure1 June 2021

Action type

認証取消

Law

Road Transport Vehicle Act

Authority

Kanto District Transport Bureau

Action date

1 June 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Kanto District Transport Bureau
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Apr 27, 2026, 03:31 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 玉井車輌有限会社

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 玉井車輌有限会社?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
玉井車輌有限会社Japanese only
Original: 玉井車輌有限会社
Governing law
Road Transport Vehicle Act
道路運送車両法
Action type
認証取消
認証取消
Action date
1 June 2021
Issuing authority
Kanto District Transport Bureau
関東運輸局
Industry context
自動車整備業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

1. There was a lack of proper overall management regarding designated maintenance by the maintenance supervisor. 2. Vehicle inspections were conducted using paper-based procedures and in cases of illegal modifications. The cancellation date of the specified automobile maintenance business: June 12, 2021. Contact: Kanto Transport Bureau, Vehicle Technology Safety Division, Maintenance Section, 045-211-7254 (extension 5475).

Show original Japanese text

1.整備主任者の特定整備等に関する統括管理不備があった。 2.ペーパー車検、不正改造状態での車検手続をした。 特定自動車整備事業の取消年月日:令和3年6月12日 関東運輸局自動車技術安全部整備課045-211-7254(内線 5475)

Business location and permit details

Business location
玉井車輌有限会社
Business location address
千葉県富津市
Legal articles
1.道路運送車両法第91条の32.道路運送車両法第94条の5
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=jidousyaseibi&EID=search&no=22

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Road Transport Vehicle Act.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.