Enforcement record

Business Suspension disclosure naming 株式会社石井自動車商会

株式会社石井自動車商会 (Road Transport Vehicle Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Road Transport Vehicle ActKanto District Transport BureauGovernment disclosure18 April 2022

Action type

Business Suspension

Law

Road Transport Vehicle Act

Authority

Kanto District Transport Bureau

Action date

18 April 2022

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Kanto District Transport Bureau
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Apr 28, 2026, 09:31 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社石井自動車商会

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社石井自動車商会?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社石井自動車商会Japanese only
Original: 株式会社石井自動車商会
Governing law
Road Transport Vehicle Act
道路運送車両法
Action type
Business Suspension
事業停止
Action date
18 April 2022
Issuing authority
Kanto District Transport Bureau
関東運輸局
Industry context
自動車整備業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The entity conducted unauthorized modifications. They did not provide an approximate estimate. They did not record in the specific maintenance record book. Contact: Kanto Transport Bureau, Vehicle Technology Safety Division, Maintenance Section, 045-211-7254 (extension 5475).

Show original Japanese text

1.不正改造を実施した。 2.概算見積書を交付しなかった。 3.特定整備記録簿を記載しなかった。 関東運輸局自動車技術安全部整備課045-211-7254(内線 5475)

Business location and permit details

Business location
株式会社石井自動車商会
Business location address
栃木県足利市
Legal articles
1.道路運送車両法第91条の3第1項及び同法第99条の22.道路運送車両法第91条の33.道路運送車両法第91条第1項
Action period
令和4年4月26日~令和4年5月10日(15日間)
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=jidousyaseibi&EID=search&no=131

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Road Transport Vehicle Act.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.