Enforcement record

Business Suspension disclosure naming 株式会社ENEOSフロンティア

株式会社ENEOSフロンティア (Road Transport Vehicle Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Road Transport Vehicle ActKyushu District Transport BureauGovernment disclosure27 March 2024

Action type

Business Suspension

Law

Road Transport Vehicle Act

Authority

Kyushu District Transport Bureau

Action date

27 March 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Kyushu District Transport Bureau
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: May 1, 2026, 09:30 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社ENEOSフロンティア

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社ENEOSフロンティア?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社ENEOSフロンティアJapanese only
Original: 株式会社ENEOSフロンティア
Governing law
Road Transport Vehicle Act
道路運送車両法
Action type
Business Suspension
事業停止
Action date
27 March 2024
Issuing authority
Kyushu District Transport Bureau
九州運輸局
Industry context
自動車整備業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

1. Falsification of specific maintenance records. 2. Overcharging for inspection and maintenance fees. 3. Inadequate overall management by the maintenance supervisor regarding specified maintenance, etc. Contact: Kyushu Transport Bureau, Vehicle Safety Department, Maintenance Division, 092-472-2537

Show original Japanese text

1.特定整備記録簿の虚偽記載。 2.点検整備料金の過剰請求。 3.整備主任者の特定整備等に関する統括管理不備。 九州運輸局自動車技術安全部整備課092-472-2537

Business location and permit details

Business location
株式会社ENEOSフロンティア長崎車検センター
Business location address
長崎県諫早市
Legal articles
1.道路運送車両法第91条第1項 2.道路運送車両法第91条の33.道路運送車両法第91条の3
Action period
令和6年3月28日~令和6年4月6日(10日間)
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=jidousyaseibi&EID=search&no=574

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Road Transport Vehicle Act.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.