Enforcement record

Order to Dismiss Motor Vehicle Inspector disclosure naming 株式会社BACS Boots

株式会社BACS Boots (Road Transport Vehicle Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Road Transport Vehicle ActKanto District Transport BureauGovernment disclosure1 March 2024

Action type

Order to Dismiss Motor Vehicle Inspector

Law

Road Transport Vehicle Act

Authority

Kanto District Transport Bureau

Action date

1 March 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Kanto District Transport Bureau
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: May 1, 2026, 03:31 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社BACS Boots

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社BACS Boots?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社BACS BootsJapanese only
Original: 株式会社BACS Boots
Governing law
Road Transport Vehicle Act
道路運送車両法
Action type
Order to Dismiss Motor Vehicle Inspector
自動車検査員の解任命令
Action date
1 March 2024
Issuing authority
Kanto District Transport Bureau
関東運輸局
Industry context
自動車整備業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

An inspector certified a vehicle as compliant despite it being in a non-compliant condition with safety standards. The inspector's dismissal order was issued on March 1, 2024. Contact: Kanto Transport Bureau, Vehicle Technology Safety Division, Maintenance Section, phone 045-211-7254 (extension 5476).

Show original Japanese text

1.検査員が保安基準不適合状態であるにもかかわらず適合証に証明した。 自動車検査員解任命令日:令和6年3月1日 関東運輸局自動車技術安全部整備課045-211-7254(内線 5476)

Business location and permit details

Business location
AUTO IN車検・タイヤセンター ニューポートひたちなか店
Business location address
茨城県ひたちなか市
Legal articles
1.道路運送車両法第94条の5第4項
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=jidousyaseibi&EID=search&no=564

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Road Transport Vehicle Act.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.