Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社

ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match6 October 2025

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

6 October 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=8050001007734&limit=10

Action summary

Company
Original: ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社
Corporate Number: 8050001007734
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
6 October 2025
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between June 9 and June 11, 2025, the Kanto Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of Hitachinaka Seaside Railway Co., Ltd. and identified several issues requiring improvement. These include: 1) Inadequate track displacement inspections under Civil Engineering Implementation Standards Article 45, with specific concerns about unmaintained sections exceeding maintenance standards, improper handling of sections where design and actual track differ, and lack of records for maintained sections, all indicating insufficient timely and appropriate maintenance as per Articles 40 and 52 of the Standards. The company is instructed to review and improve operational and management procedures, possibly utilizing specialized agencies, to ensure proper track maintenance. 2) Failure to submit reports for transportation disruptions occurring on March 16, 2022; July 26, 2022; March 7, 2023; and May 8, 2024, as required by Railway Accident Reporting Regulations Article 5, Paragraph 4. The company must verify if other incidents have gone unreported and ensure compliance with reporting obligations. 3) Personnel conducting train or vehicle operations did not have their physical fitness verified before starting work, contrary to Ministerial Ordinance Article 10 concerning technical standards for railways. The company must promptly confirm the fitness of these personnel and implement proper management measures. 4) The KiHa 100 series diesel railcars, which had not been confirmed under Railway Business Act Article 13, were used for driver training without track closure measures from January 20 to April 13, 2025. The company must ensure track closures are properly enforced when operating unconfirmed vehicles and review related regulations and train staff accordingly. The company is required to report the corrective actions by December 8, 2025.

Show original Japanese text

令和7年6月9日から6月11日まで、貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和7年12月8日までに報告されたい。 記 1.土木実施基準第45条に規定されている軌道変位検査において、以下のことを確認した。 ①整備基準値を超過していた箇所(以下「整備基準値超過箇所」)の未整備箇所。 ②整備基準値超過箇所の未整備箇所のうち、一部区間については現地と設計線路諸元が異なるため、通り変位が解消されない箇所があり、それに対し適切に対応されていないこと。 ③整備基準値超過箇所のうち、整備した箇所の記録が残されていないこと。 ①、②については、土木実施基準第40条に規定されている適時適切の整備が行われていないことを確認した。 ③については、土木実施基準第52条に規定されている記録の保存が行われていないことを確認した。 よって、軌道の適切な保全を行うため、専門機関を活用する等、業務の実施方法及び管理方法について検証し、軌道管理全体について見直しを行い、適切な管理ができるよう必要な措置を講ずること。 2.令和4年3月16日、令和4年7月26日、令和5年3月7日及び令和6年5月8日に報告対象の輸送障害が発生しているが、鉄道事故等報告規則第5条第4項に基づく鉄道運転事故等届出書の提出が行われていないことを確認した。 よって、報告対象の鉄道運転事故等について、他に報告されていない事象の有無について確認するとともに、同規則に基づく報告が確実にされるよう必要な措置を講ずること。 3.鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令第10条に基づく、列車又は車両の運転に直接関係する作業を行う係員の身体機能検査の結果について、運転管理者及び乗務員指導管理者が作業を行うのに支障がないことを確かめずに作業に就かせていたことを確認した。 よって、同係員の身体機能検査の結果について、作業を行うのに支障がないことを速やかに確認し、管理者が適切に管理できるよう必要な措置を講ずること。 4.鉄道事業法第13条で定める車両の確認を受けていないキハ100形気動車について、令和7年1月20日から4月13日の間、線路閉鎖の措置を講じずに乗務員の操縦訓練を行っていたことを確認した。 よって、車両の確認を受けていない車両を本線上で走行させる場合には、運転実施基準第58条に基づく線路閉鎖を確実に実施した上で行うとともに、線路閉鎖の要否の解釈に齟齬が出ないよう、必要に応じ関係規程(線路閉鎖取扱規程、線路閉鎖手順書)を見直すことや関係者への再教育等、確実な取扱いができるよう必要な措置を講ずること。 以 上 【関東運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
茨城県ひたちなか市
Legal articles
・鉄道事業法・鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令・鉄道事故等報告規則
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=204

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-17T09:21:55.808+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T09:21:55.744+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-11T12:34:49.97567+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "bb7e305b-67ca-4ca1-bd0b-ebdeb9c7eda9",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/bb7e305b-67ca-4ca1-bd0b-ebdeb9c7eda9",
    "company_name_original": "ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": "ひたちなか海浜鉄道株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "8050001007734",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/bb7e305b-67ca-4ca1-bd0b-ebdeb9c7eda9",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=204",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/6e48306c37gcfvkx",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=204",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-11T12:34:49.97567+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:55.808+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T13:01:49.517+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:55.744+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T18:03:37.324Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.