Enforcement record

認証取消 disclosure naming 原 盛利

原 盛利 (Road Transport Vehicle Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Road Transport Vehicle ActKyushu District Transport BureauGovernment disclosure7 September 2023

Action type

認証取消

Law

Road Transport Vehicle Act

Authority

Kyushu District Transport Bureau

Action date

7 September 2023

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Kyushu District Transport Bureau
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 11:19 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 原 盛利

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 原 盛利?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
原 盛利Japanese only
Original: 原 盛利
Governing law
Road Transport Vehicle Act
道路運送車両法
Action type
認証取消
認証取消
Action date
7 September 2023
Issuing authority
Kyushu District Transport Bureau
九州運輸局
Industry context
自動車整備業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Har Seiri's automobile repair business, located in Isa City, Kagoshima Prefecture, had its certification canceled by the Kyushu Transport Bureau on September 7, 2023, under Article 81, Paragraph 2 of the Road Transport Vehicle Law. The cancellation was due to the failure to submit a business closure notification for the business premises, Har Automobile Maintenance Factory. The violation details include the non-submission of the business closure report, leading to the cancellation of the certification for the specific automobile maintenance business.

Show original Japanese text

1.事業場の廃止届出の未提出。 自動車特定整備事業の認証の取消日:令和5年9月7日 九州運輸局自動車技術安全部整備課092-472-2537

Business location and permit details

Business location
原自動車整備工場
Business location address
鹿児島県伊佐市
Legal articles
1.道路運送車両法第81条第2項
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=jidousyaseibi&EID=search&no=263

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Road Transport Vehicle Act.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.