Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 札幌市

札幌市 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match24 December 2021

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

24 December 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 札幌市

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 札幌市

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=9000020011002&limit=10

Action summary

Company
札幌市Japanese original
Original: 札幌市
Corporate Number: 9000020011002
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
24 December 2021
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The audit revealed that Sapporo City had modified railway safety manuals without proper notification to the regional transport bureau as required by Article 4-2 of the Railway Operations Regulations. It also found that inspections such as rail fastening conditions and track inspections (including 'passing' and 'height difference' checks) were not conducted on certain lines, excluding intersections with signals. Additionally, there were deficiencies in electrical insulation resistance measurements and inspections of train components, such as the height of sand pipes and rescue devices, for specific train models. The authority was instructed to promptly conduct necessary inspections, revise related regulations and manuals to ensure consistency, and reinforce internal compliance and inspection systems to maintain safety standards. The findings and corrective measures are to be reported by the end of January 2022.

Show original Japanese text

貴局に対しては、令和3年10月13日から10月28日まで保安監査を実施した。その結果、以下のとおり改善を要する事項が認められたことから、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明した上で、同種事象の再発防止のための措置を講ずること。 なお、講じた措置については、令和4年1月末日までに報告されたい。 記 1.軌道運転規則第4条に基づく、軌道電気施設整備心得について、変電所を新設した際に同規則第4条の2に規定する地方運輸局長への届出を行わないまま、同心得を変更している事実を確認した。 よって、速やかに同心得の変更届出を行うとともに、関係法令の理解を深め、同規則に基づく手続きを確実に行うよう管理体制を見直すなど、必要な措置を講ずること。 2.軌道運転規則第4条に基づく、線路整備心得第2条に規定する軌道定期検査及び線路施設等の検査について、以下の事実を確認した。 ①信号機の設置されている交差点を除く本線路について、線路施設等の検査のうち「レール締結状態」の検査を実施していないこと。 ②電車事業所構内の一部区間を除く構内線について、軌道定期検査のうち「通り」と「高低」などの検査を実施していないこと。 ③線路整備心得第2条で規定する検査項目のうち、線路施設整備マニュアルでは、側線の軌道定期検査の「通り」と「高低」が規定されていないこと、及び線路施設検査マニュアルでは、交差点を除く本線路の「レール締結状態」の検査が規定されていないこと。 よって、検査を実施していない箇所について速やかに必要な検査を実施するとともに、心得とマニュアルが適合するよう関係規程を見直すこと。 また、本関係規程以外の規程類も点検して、必要に応じ見直すとともに、安全を確保するために必要な関係規程を遵守する重要性を再認識し、関係規程の適切な管理及び検査が実施できるよう体制を見直すなどの措置を講ずること。 3.軌道運転規則第4条に基づく、軌道電気施設整備心得及び電車整備基準の検査について、以下の事実を確認した。これらについては、改めて関係規程の内容を社内に周知徹底し、遵守すること。 (1)軌道電気施設整備心得について 電気回路の絶縁抵抗の測定結果(令和3年5月1日にすすきの停留場構内で発生した電気火災事故に伴い修理)について、外注先には記録が保存されていたが、貴局には保存されていないこと。 (2)電車整備基準について ①8500形車両の重要部・全般検査に係る総合検査について、「砂まき管の高さ」を規定せず、検査を実施していないこと。 ②A1200形車両の重要部・全般検査に係る総合検査において、「救助器及び砂まき管の高さ」及び「運転士異常時列車停止装置の機能」の検査を実施していないこと。 【北海道運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
北海道札幌市
Legal articles
軌道運転規則
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=6

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-17T09:24:38.757+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T09:24:38.698+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-10T18:33:24.198748+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "0235350a-0d75-4fc7-82ac-1f64de9fd040",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/0235350a-0d75-4fc7-82ac-1f64de9fd040",
    "company_name_original": "札幌市",
    "company_name_registry": "札幌市",
    "corporate_number": "9000020011002",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/0235350a-0d75-4fc7-82ac-1f64de9fd040",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=6",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/9bb1e7d6faf9urbf",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=6",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-10T18:33:24.198748+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T09:24:38.757+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T13:30:54.915+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:24:38.698+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T15:55:05.499Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.