Company profile

Company profileJapanese original

江渕設備株式会社

江渕設備株式会社· Corporate Number: 8290001051386

This page aggregates company identity, Official Gazette notices, enforcement records, related-company signals, and source-review links into one public-record profile.

Ask RegBase about this company

Current page: Company profile

This page brings together Official Gazette notices, enforcement records, registry data, related-company signals, and source-review links for one company. Open individual enforcement records from the history section below.

Public Record Summary

Procurement suspensions
2
Latest public record
10 Feb 2011

Company Identity and Registry Data

English display name
江渕設備株式会社
Original Japanese name
江渕設備株式会社
Corporate Number
8290001051386
Registered address
福岡県久留米市国分町１１７２番地５

Note: Detailed gBizINFO registry data may not be available for this company yet. Use the public registry links below to review supplemental source information.

View on gBizINFOView on the National Tax Agency Corporate Number site

Data sources

Direct inquiry

Need a person to review 江渕設備株式会社?

No account needed

Ask a Japan-based team member to confirm the legal entity, explain the recorded public sources, or scope a documented screening.

Inquiry context: 江渕設備株式会社 / Corporate Number 8290001051386

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 江渕設備株式会社?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Public procurement suspension history

Measures published by Japanese contracting authorities, presented separately from regulatory enforcement.

Confirmed identity · 2 records
Period ended指名停止

文部科学省

Measure date
10 Feb 2011
Suspension period
10 Feb 2011 – 9 Jun 2011
Reason
Fraud or false representation江渕設備株式会社が元請業者から請け負った一次下請工事を、株式会社豊福土木に一括して請け負わせた（株式会社豊福土木に関しては、文部科学省の有資格登録がなされていない。）。このことは、建設業法第２８条第１項第４号に該当する。 また、江渕設備株式会社は、平成２２年４月３０日を審査基準日とする経営事項審査申請書に虚偽（技術職員の水増し）の記載をし、当該申請に基づき評定された経営事項審査結果通知書をもって、発注機関に対して入札参加申請を行った。このことが、建設業法第２８条第１項第２号に該当するとして、当該業者は、平成２２年１２月２７日に福岡県知事より営業の一部停止処分（４５日間）を受けた。

Japanese source text is retained where an official English translation is not available.

Open the official-record viewOfficial source
Period ended指名停止

文部科学省

Measure date
10 Feb 2011
Suspension period
10 Feb 2011 – 9 May 2011
Reason
Fraud or false representation江渕設備株式会社が元請業者から請け負った一次下請工事を、株式会社豊福土木に一括して請け負わせた（株式会社豊福土木に関しては、文部科学省の有資格登録がなされていない。）。このことは、建設業法第２８条第１項第４号に該当する。 また、江渕設備株式会社は、平成２２年４月３０日を審査基準日とする経営事項審査申請書に虚偽（技術職員の水増し）の記載をし、当該申請に基づき評定された経営事項審査結果通知書をもって、発注機関に対して入札参加申請を行った。このことが、建設業法第２８条第１項第２号に該当するとして、当該業者は、平成２２年１２月２７日に福岡県知事より営業の一部停止処分（４５日間）を受けた。

Japanese source text is retained where an official English translation is not available.

Open the official-record viewOfficial source

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

About this English name

No official English name source is recorded. The original Japanese name is shown.

If this profile contains an error or your company needs to add context, please use the data correction request form. Submissions are reviewed under RegBase editorial policy.

This page mechanically aggregates and structures public government disclosures and public registry data under the methodology. It is not legal advice, credit scoring, or a final procurement decision. Always verify against the official source pages.