Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 沼田町

沼田町 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match5 February 2025

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

5 February 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 沼田町

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=4000020014389&limit=10

Action summary

Company
沼田町Japanese original
Original: 沼田町
Corporate Number: 4000020014389
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
5 February 2025
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between January 14 and 15, 2025, the Hokkaido Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of Numata Town's ropeway facilities. The audit revealed that the town failed to record inspection results for various safety components, such as the return pulley, grip devices, main body bolts, tension pulleys, control devices, and rescue equipment, as required by Article 5 of the Special Ropeway Maintenance Regulations. The town is instructed to review and revise its inspection record forms to ensure compliance with Article 8 of the same regulations, aligning existing facilities with maintenance standards. Additionally, some ropeway staff had not received necessary training, and no records of training were maintained, making it impossible to verify compliance. The town must promptly conduct training for staff who have not yet been trained and ensure that all future training is properly documented and managed. The town is required to report the corrective actions taken by March 5, 2025.

Show original Japanese text

令和7年1月14日から15日まで、貴町に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和7年3月5日までに報告されたい。 記 1.単線固定循環式特殊索道整備細則第5条に基づく適合確認検査において、以下の項目の成績を記録していないことを確認した。 ・ 折返設備:折返滑車 「取付状態の良否」、「部材の損傷、変形、き裂の有無」、「溝の異常摩耗、損傷の有無」、「回転状態の良否」、「搬器振止装置の作用の良否」、「給油状態の良否」 ・ 搬器:握索装置 「締付状態の良否」 ・ 搬器:本体 「ボルト、ナットの緩み、脱落の有無」、「落下防止装置の損傷の有無」 ・ 原動緊張設備:原動緊張滑車 「搬器振止装置の作用の良否」、「給油状態の良否」 ・ 原動緊張設備:制御装置 「据付状態の良否」 ・ 保安設備:救助装置 「外観状態の良否」 よって、単線固定循環式特殊索道整備細則第8条に基づき検査の成績を確実に記録できるよう、現有施設と整備細則の整合を図ったうえで検査成績の記録表の見直しを図るなど必要な措置を講ずること。 2.教育訓練について、一部の索道係員に実施されていなかった。また、教育訓練の記録が作成、保存されておらず、その実施状況を確認できない状況であった。 よって、教育を実施していない者に対して速やかに教育訓練を実施するとともに、今後、索道係員に対して必要な教育訓練を確実に実施し、その記録を保存、管理するよう改善すること。 以上 【北海道運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
北海道雨竜郡沼田町
Legal articles
索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=169

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-18T08:47:08.586+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-18T08:47:08.533+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "b95ad077-fb71-419a-910d-06b909110d50",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-zhao-tian-ting-20250205",
    "company_name_original": "沼田町",
    "company_name_registry": "沼田町",
    "corporate_number": "4000020014389",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-zhao-tian-ting-20250205",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=169",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-18T08:47:08.586+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:12:07.782+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-18T08:47:08.533+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T15:16:20.225Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.