Enforcement record

Recommendation disclosure naming 株式会社ティラド

株式会社ティラド (Subcontract Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Subcontract ActJapan Fair Trade CommissionGovernment disclosure24 February 2026

Action type

Recommendation

Law

Subcontract Act

Authority

Japan Fair Trade Commission

Action date

24 February 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming 株式会社ティラド

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 株式会社ティラド

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%A0%AA%E5%BC%8F%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%83%A9%E3%83%89&limit=10

Action summary

Company
株式会社ティラドJapanese only
Original: 株式会社ティラド
Governing law
Subcontract Act
下請法
Action type
Recommendation
勧告
Action date
24 February 2026
Issuing authority
Japan Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
Industry context
製造販売

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The Fair Trade Commission investigated TIRAD Corporation and found that, from January 1, 2024, to December 11, 2025, the company lent molds and jigs to subcontractors and, despite not placing orders for the products made using these molds for a long period, required the subcontractors to store a total of 4,311 molds free of charge. This conduct was deemed to unjustly harm the interests of the subcontractors. Based on Article 7, Paragraph 3 of the Subcontracting Law, the Commission issued a recommendation to TIRAD on February 24, 2026.

Show original Japanese text

ティラドは、下請事業者に対して自社が所有する金型及び治具を貸与したところ、遅くとも令和6年1月1日から令和7年12月11日までの間、当該金型等を用いて製造する本件製品の発注を長期間行わないにもかかわらず、下請事業者に対し、合計4,311個の金型等を自己のために無償で保管させることにより、下請事業者の利益を不当に害していた。

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.

Subcontracting law governing unfair treatment of subcontractors by main contractors.

Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Japan Fair Trade Commission source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-10T07:49:53.692+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-10T07:49:54.258+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-10T07:50:40.04616+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "94be447b-abd7-4ea2-9323-da1604c0ba85",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/shitaukeho-teirado-20260224-0b16687725",
    "company_name_original": "株式会社ティラド",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "下請法",
      "en": "Subcontract Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "勧告",
      "en": "Recommendation"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "公正取引委員会",
      "en": "Japan Fair Trade Commission"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 80,
    "method": "normalized_name_existing_company",
    "method_label": "Normalized Japanese name matched to an existing RegBase company profile",
    "notes": "Matched by normalized Japanese company name to one existing RegBase company profile. The selected profile has a Corporate Number, but that number was not present in this disclosure and therefore does not confirm the entity match."
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.",
    "practicalNote": "Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.",
    "lawContext": "Subcontracting law governing unfair treatment of subcontractors by main contractors."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/shitaukeho-teirado-20260224-0b16687725",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.jftc.go.jp/houdou/pressrelease/2026/feb/260224_trad.html",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/0fabaa397demxxch",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.jftc.go.jp/houdou/pressrelease/2026/feb/260224_trad.html",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-10T07:50:40.04616+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-10T07:49:53.692+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T07:50:36.09+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-10T07:49:54.258+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T16:16:45.446Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.