Enforcement record
Recommendation disclosure naming 米国医療機器・IVD工業会
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Recommendation
Law
不明
Authority
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Action date
27 August 2021
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Source verification
Public-source and preservation status
- Publishing authority
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- Official source URL
- Recorded by RegBase
- Entity match
- Not confirmed; shown under the published name
- Kiroku preservation
- Queued for preservation
- Captured: Apr 27, 2026, 09:01 PM JST
“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.
Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.
Public documents and saved materials
View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.
Loading materials…
Action summary
- Company
- 米国医療機器・IVD工業会Japanese onlyOriginal: 米国医療機器・IVD工業会
- Governing law
- 不明不明
- Action type
- Recommendation勧告
- Action date
- 27 August 2021
- Issuing authority
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare厚生労働省
- Industry context
- 医療機器・IVD
Violation
Explanation of efforts related to international harmonization, reference country designation, challenges and requests for programmable medical devices, work style reform, and utilization of IT systems.
Show original Japanese text
国際整合、リファレンスカントリー化、プログラム医療機器の課題と要望、働き方改革とITシステム活用に関する取組を説明。
Compliance context
MediumA regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.
Japanese regulatory disclosure under 不明.
Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.