Enforcement record

Recommendation disclosure naming 住商リアルティ・マネジメント株式会社

住商リアルティ・マネジメント株式会社 (Financial Instruments and Exchange Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Financial Instruments and Exchange ActSecurities and Exchange Surveillance CommissionGovernment disclosure11 November 2025

Action type

Recommendation

Law

Financial Instruments and Exchange Act

Authority

Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission

Action date

11 November 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Jul 12, 2026, 02:52 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Action summary

Company
住商リアルティ・マネジメント株式会社Japanese only
Original: 住商リアルティ・マネジメント株式会社
Governing law
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act
金融商品取引法
Action type
Recommendation
勧告
Action date
11 November 2025
Issuing authority
Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission
証券取引等監視委員会
Industry context
金融商品取引業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The company conducted hearings with multiple real estate appraisers regarding yield and land value, and upon realizing that the company's self-assessed price level (based on these hearings) did not meet the acquisition price desired by the parent company, it provided property information to another appraiser before internal approval procedures and obtained an estimated appraisal value. As a result, the company engaged in inappropriate conduct to obtain an appraisal value that meets the price proposed by the parent company.

Show original Japanese text

当社は、複数の不動産鑑定業者に「利回り感」や「更地価格」等のヒアリングを行い、当該ヒアリングを踏まえた本物件の価格水準(自己査定)が、親会社から提示された他社の取得希望価格とする価格に満たないことを把握すると、内規に反し、社内稟議前の段階から別の不動産鑑定業者に物件情報を提供し概算鑑定額を聴取した。その結果、親会社からの提示価格を満たす不動産鑑定評価額を得るために不適切な働きかけを行った。

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.

Financial markets law covering securities, investment services, disclosure, and market conduct.

Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.