Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 函館市

函館市 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile

Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match18 February 2026

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

18 February 2026

RegBase evidence report

Japanese public-record enforcement check

Saveable record of the confirmed target entity, regulator disclosure, source status, and review notes for internal compliance files.

Report ID: RB-EN-ENFORCEMENT-2F64789A-73CF-432-202607241459
Generated at: 24 July 2026 at 23:59
Record URL: https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/2f64789a-73cf-432d-9325-16040fca57f2

1. Review Summary

Target entity	函館市	Corporate Number	9000020012025
Enforcement record	1 record	Other confirmed records for this company	2 records
Action date	18 February 2026	Authority
Law	Railway Business Act	Action type	Administrative Guidance
Source status	Preserved public-source archive recorded

This report summarizes public Japanese government disclosure data held by RegBase. It is not a credit score, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or adverse-media determination. Confirm important decisions against the linked official Japanese source.

2. Target Entity

English display name	函館市
Original Japanese name	函館市
English-name source	Japanese original
Corporate Number	9000020012025
Company status	Active
Representative	Not recorded
Registered address	北海道函館市東雲町４－１３
Industry / capital	Industry: Not recorded / Capital: -

3. Enforcement Record

Target name in disclosure	函館市
Authority	()
Law / action type	Railway Business Act / Administrative Guidance
Action / announcement date	Action: 18 February 2026 / Announcement: 10 July 2026
English summary	Between December 3 and 5, 2025, the Hokkaido Transport Bureau carried out a safety audit of Hakodate City. The audit revealed deficiencies in vehicle inspection records, operator training, and accident prevention measures. Specific issues include incomplete records of air pipe leak inspections, unrecorded wheel load measurements, and inadequate ongoing training for train operators, especially regarding handling different routes at the Juji-gai intersection. Additionally, a derailment incident on December 15, 2024, due to operational error was noted, with a failure to conduct annual refresher training for snow removal train operators before winter 2025. The bureau has instructed Hakodate City to take corrective measures, ensure proper inspection and record-keeping systems, establish continuous operator training, and implement measures to prevent recurrence of accidents, with a report due by March 18, 2026.
Original Japanese text	令和７年１２月３日から５日まで、貴局に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。講じた措置については、令和８年３月１８日までに報告されたい。記１．車両の検査において、以下の事実を確認した。 ① 車両整備心得第６条に基づく２０００形、３０００形及び９６００形の月検査において、シングルアーム型パンタグラフ集電装置の検査項目のうち、エアーパイプの空気漏れの有無に係る検査結果について、同心得第２０条に基づいた記録・保存が行われていないこと。 ② 同心得第８条に基づく３００２号車の全般検査において、台車（８０－２５０）の検査結果について、同心得第２０条に基づいた記録・保存が行われていなかったこと。 ③ 同心得第８条に基づく３００２号車の全般検査において、台車（８０－２２１）を装着したことを記録していなかったこと。 ④ 同心得第９条に基づく３００１号車の随時検査において、台車（８０－２２１）を装着した際、輪重測定検査を実施していなかったこと。 ⑤ 同心得第９条に基づく３００２号車の随時検査において、台車（８０－２５０）を装着した際の検査結果について、同心得第２０条に基づいた記録・保存が行われていなかったこと。 ⑥ ⑤の際、同心得第１６条に基づく３００２号車の試運転を、輪重測定検査の前に実施していたこと。よって、車両整備心得に規定されている検査項目と検査記録表の整合を確認し必要な措置を講じたうえで、適切に検査を実施し、確実に検査結果を記録・保存できる管理体制を構築すること。２．電車運転取扱心得第４条の２に規定する運転従事員の教育及び訓練について、十字街交差点において異なる系統の進路に進入した場合の取扱い教育が運転士の新規養成時にのみ行われ、その後、運転士に対して必要な教育の実施、十分な知識・技能を保有していることの確認をしていないことを確認した。また、当該取扱いについては口頭で引き継がれており、資料も確認できなかった。よって、継続的に教育することができる体制を整えるとともに、運転士に対して必要な教育を実施し、十分な知識・技能を保有していることを確認してその職務に従事させることができるよう必要な措置を講ずること。３．令和４年１２月１５日に駒場車庫前停留場内での運転取扱い誤りによる除雪電車の車両脱線事故を受け、軌道事故等報告規則第３条に基づき提出された運転事故等報告書の再発防止対策について、毎年、冬期を迎える前に除雪電車運転に選任した運転士及び除雪装置操縦者に対して実施することとしている研修を令和６年度は実施していないことを確認した。よって、運転事故等の再発防止対策が確実に実施されるよう必要な措置を講ずること。以上【北海道運輸局】
Official source	https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=216
Source archive	https://kiroku.today/a/5cd30456f4gp9wwi
Extraction / evidence timestamps	Extracted: 17 July 2026 at 18:21 / Evidence checked: 17 July 2026 at 18:21 / Archive captured: 12 July 2026 at 03:31

4. Business Location and Permit Details

Business location address	北海道函館市
Legal articles	軌道法軌道運転規則軌道事故等報告規則
Overview page	https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=216

5. Other Confirmed Records for This Company

1. 18 February 2026 Administrative Guidance

Company	函館市
Law	Railway Business Act
Summary	Between December 3 and 5, 2025, the Hokkaido Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of Hakodate City. The audit revealed several issues requiring improvement, including incomplete records of vehicle inspections, inadequate driver training on route handling at the Juji-gai intersection, and lack of annual training for snow removal train operators following a derailment incident on December 15, 2024. The bureau has instructed Hakodate City to take corrective measures, ensure proper inspection and record-keeping systems, establish ongoing driver education programs, and implement measures to prevent recurrence of accidents. The city is required to report on the measures taken by March 18, 2026.
RegBase URL	https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-han-guan-shi-20260218

2. 8 November 2022 Administrative Guidance

Company	函館市
Law	Railway Business Act
Summary	Between October 17 and 19, 2022, the Hokkaido Transport Bureau carried out a safety audit of Hakodate City. The audit revealed deficiencies in safety management and inspection practices. As a result, the bureau issued administrative guidance to Hakodate City, requiring the implementation of corrective measures. The guidance specifies that Hakodate City must establish a system to accurately grasp on-site conditions, regularly verify operational status, organize issues, and strengthen safety management to ensure the feasibility of improvements. Specific issues include: 1) Management of track wear measurement, which exceeded the scheduled period in fiscal year 2021; 2) Inspection procedures for substation equipment, particularly insulation resistance tests at Komaba-cho Substation, which were conducted improperly and did not meet standards; 3) Proper recording and storage of monthly VVVF inverter inspections for train models 2000, 3000, and 9600. Hakodate City is required to review inspection methods, ensure proper execution and judgment based on standards, and maintain accurate records. The bureau requested that Hakodate City report on the corrective actions taken by December 8, 2022.
RegBase URL	https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/d2a9cb8a-8fe2-416a-af72-2acacceba7e6

Reviewer Notes

Reviewer		Team / company
Review purpose
Additional notes

□ Official source URL or archived source was checked.
□ Corporate Number, address, or other identifiers were reviewed to avoid confusing similarly named entities.
□ This document is understood as a public-record evidence file, not a credit decision or legal opinion.

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 函館市

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 函館市

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=9000020012025&limit=10

Open JSON Specs

Action summary

Company: 函館市Japanese original
Original: 函館市
Corporate Number: 9000020012025
Entity match: Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。
Governing law: Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type: Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date: 18 February 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context: 鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between December 3 and 5, 2025, the Hokkaido Transport Bureau carried out a safety audit of Hakodate City. The audit revealed deficiencies in vehicle inspection records, operator training, and accident prevention measures. Specific issues include incomplete records of air pipe leak inspections, unrecorded wheel load measurements, and inadequate ongoing training for train operators, especially regarding handling different routes at the Juji-gai intersection. Additionally, a derailment incident on December 15, 2024, due to operational error was noted, with a failure to conduct annual refresher training for snow removal train operators before winter 2025. The bureau has instructed Hakodate City to take corrective measures, ensure proper inspection and record-keeping systems, establish continuous operator training, and implement measures to prevent recurrence of accidents, with a report due by March 18, 2026.

Show original Japanese text

令和７年１２月３日から５日まで、貴局に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。講じた措置については、令和８年３月１８日までに報告されたい。記１．車両の検査において、以下の事実を確認した。 ① 車両整備心得第６条に基づく２０００形、３０００形及び９６００形の月検査において、シングルアーム型パンタグラフ集電装置の検査項目のうち、エアーパイプの空気漏れの有無に係る検査結果について、同心得第２０条に基づいた記録・保存が行われていないこと。 ② 同心得第８条に基づく３００２号車の全般検査において、台車（８０－２５０）の検査結果について、同心得第２０条に基づいた記録・保存が行われていなかったこと。 ③ 同心得第８条に基づく３００２号車の全般検査において、台車（８０－２２１）を装着したことを記録していなかったこと。 ④ 同心得第９条に基づく３００１号車の随時検査において、台車（８０－２２１）を装着した際、輪重測定検査を実施していなかったこと。 ⑤ 同心得第９条に基づく３００２号車の随時検査において、台車（８０－２５０）を装着した際の検査結果について、同心得第２０条に基づいた記録・保存が行われていなかったこと。 ⑥ ⑤の際、同心得第１６条に基づく３００２号車の試運転を、輪重測定検査の前に実施していたこと。よって、車両整備心得に規定されている検査項目と検査記録表の整合を確認し必要な措置を講じたうえで、適切に検査を実施し、確実に検査結果を記録・保存できる管理体制を構築すること。２．電車運転取扱心得第４条の２に規定する運転従事員の教育及び訓練について、十字街交差点において異なる系統の進路に進入した場合の取扱い教育が運転士の新規養成時にのみ行われ、その後、運転士に対して必要な教育の実施、十分な知識・技能を保有していることの確認をしていないことを確認した。また、当該取扱いについては口頭で引き継がれており、資料も確認できなかった。よって、継続的に教育することができる体制を整えるとともに、運転士に対して必要な教育を実施し、十分な知識・技能を保有していることを確認してその職務に従事させることができるよう必要な措置を講ずること。３．令和４年１２月１５日に駒場車庫前停留場内での運転取扱い誤りによる除雪電車の車両脱線事故を受け、軌道事故等報告規則第３条に基づき提出された運転事故等報告書の再発防止対策について、毎年、冬期を迎える前に除雪電車運転に選任した運転士及び除雪装置操縦者に対して実施することとしている研修を令和６年度は実施していないことを確認した。よって、運転事故等の再発防止対策が確実に実施されるよう必要な措置を講ずること。以上【北海道運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address: 北海道函館市
Legal articles: 軌道法軌道運転規則軌道事故等報告規則
Overview page: https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=216

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack

Extracted at: 2026-07-17T09:21:42.859+00:00
Evidence checked: 2026-07-17T09:21:42.796+00:00
Archive captured: 2026-07-11T18:31:07.166412+00:00

Show audit JSON

{
  "record": {
    "id": "2f64789a-73cf-432d-9325-16040fca57f2",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/2f64789a-73cf-432d-9325-16040fca57f2",
    "company_name_original": "函館市",
    "company_name_registry": "函館市",
    "corporate_number": "9000020012025",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/2f64789a-73cf-432d-9325-16040fca57f2",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=216",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/5cd30456f4gp9wwi",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=216",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-11T18:31:07.166412+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:42.859+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T12:50:41.617+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:42.796+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T14:59:03.540Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

Company info

English name: 函館市 Japanese original
Japanese name: 函館市
Corporate Number: 9000020012025
Registered address: 北海道函館市東雲町４－１３

See company profile →

Other confirmed records for this company

See full company profile →

Recent records in the same industry

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.