Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 株式会社デュアルアシスト

株式会社デュアルアシスト (Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business ActTokyo Metropolitan GovernmentGovernment disclosure10 March 2026

Action type

Directive

Law

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act

Authority

Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Action date

10 March 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Review the details and materials for this record to see the available official sources and preserved files before purchasing.

Save a record of your review

Keep the records and their sources together

Review what is included, then save the report and CSV in an evidence ZIP for internal sharing. Available source files vary by target.

See the included records, sources, and available files on the next page.

Action summary

Company
株式会社デュアルアシストJapanese only
Original: 株式会社デュアルアシスト
Governing law
Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act
宅地建物取引業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
10 March 2026
Issuing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
東京都
Industry context
宅建業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

In December of Reiwa 4 (2022), the respondent, Dual Assist Co., Ltd., conducted brokerage activities for a building lease between landlord A and tenant B. During this process, they did not provide explanations regarding deposit procedures, failed to have a licensed real estate transaction agent sign the lease agreement as stipulated in Article 37, Paragraph 2 of the Real Estate Business Act, and erroneously listed terms such as 'Real Estate Transaction Supervisor,' 'Transaction Supervisor,' and 'Transaction Supervisor Certificate' in the Important Matters Explanation document, using pre-revision terminology. These actions contravened Article 35-2, Item 2, Article 37, Paragraph 3, and Articles 65, Paragraphs 1 and 3 of the Act. The Tokyo Metropolitan Government issued an instruction on March 10, 2026.

Show original Japanese text

被処分者は、令和4年12月に、貸主Aと借主Bとの間の建物の賃貸借につき媒介業務を行った。この業務において、①供託所等に関する説明をしなかった。②宅地建物取引業法第37条第2項に定める書面(賃貸借契約書)に、宅地建物取引士をして記名させなかった。③同法第35条に定める書面(重要事項説明書)に、誤って、法改正前の用語である、「宅地建物取引主任者」、「取引主任者」及び「取引主任者証」を記載した。これらのことは、①は、同法第35条の2第2号に、②は、同法第37条第3項に、それぞれ違反し、③は、同法第65条第3項及び第1項第2号に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
埼玉県川口市
Legal articles
宅地建物取引業法第65条第3項
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=takuti&EID=search&no=237

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Real-estate transaction law covering licensed real-estate brokers and related transaction duties.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.