Enforcement record
Recommendation disclosure naming 富士通フロンテック株式会社
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Recommendation
Law
Subcontract Act
Authority
Japan Fair Trade Commission
Action date
24 March 2026
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Source verification
Public-source and preservation status
- Publishing authority
- Japan Fair Trade Commission
- Official source URL
- Recorded by RegBase
- Entity match
- Not confirmed; shown under the published name
- Kiroku preservation
- Queued for preservation
- Captured: May 10, 2026, 03:04 AM JST
“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.
Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.
Public documents and saved materials
View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.
Loading materials…
Action summary
- Company
- 富士通フロンテック株式会社Japanese onlyOriginal: 富士通フロンテック株式会社
- Governing law
- Subcontract Act下請法
- Action type
- Recommendation勧告
- Action date
- 24 March 2026
- Issuing authority
- Japan Fair Trade Commission公正取引委員会
- Industry context
- 電子部品製造
Violation
Fujitsu Frontech, by at least May 2024, did not place orders for products manufactured using certain molds for an extended period. Despite this, the company caused subcontractors to store a total of 2,577 molds free of charge, thereby unfairly harming the interests of the subcontractors.
Show original Japanese text
富士通フロンテックは、遅くとも令和６年５月以降、当該金型等を用いて製造する本件製品の発注を長期間行わないにもかかわらず、下請事業者に対し、合計２，５７７個の金型等を自己のために無償で保管させることにより、下請事業者の利益を不当に害していた
Compliance context
MediumA regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.
Subcontracting law governing unfair treatment of subcontractors by main contractors.
Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.