Enforcement record
Surcharge Payment Order disclosure naming 株式会社電通グループ
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Surcharge Payment Order
Law
Antimonopoly Act
Authority
Japan Fair Trade Commission
Action date
11 March 2026
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Source verification
Public-source and preservation status
- Publishing authority
- Japan Fair Trade Commission
- Official source URL
- Recorded by RegBase
- Entity match
- Not confirmed; shown under the published name
- Kiroku preservation
- Completed archive verified
- Captured: May 10, 2026, 03:03 AM JST
“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.
Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.
Action summary
- Company
- 株式会社電通グループJapanese onlyOriginal: 株式会社電通グループ
- Governing law
- Antimonopoly Act独占禁止法
- Action type
- Surcharge Payment Order課徴金納付命令
- Action date
- 11 March 2026
- Issuing authority
- Japan Fair Trade Commission公正取引委員会
- Industry context
- 広告・イベント運営
Violation
On March 11, 2024, the Japan Fair Trade Commission issued a surcharge payment order to Dentsu Group Inc. regarding a bid-rigging incident involving contracts for planning and other tasks related to Tokyo 2020 Olympic test events. The commission conducted an investigation and determined that there was a violation of the Anti-Monopoly Act, leading to a decision to revise the surcharge amount.
Show original Japanese text
電通グループに対し、東京2020オリンピック・パラリンピック競技大会に関するテストイベント計画立案等業務委託契約等の入札談合事件について犯則調査を行った結果、独占禁止法に違反する犯罪があったと思料して、課徴金額を変更する決定をした。
Compliance context
Medium-highA formal administrative order requiring payment of a monetary surcharge.
Competition law covering private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade, unfair trade practices, and related conduct.
Review the amount, covered conduct, recurrence history, and remediation evidence before making a risk decision.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
- Extracted at
- 2026-05-09T18:03:12.201+00:00
- Evidence checked
- 2026-05-09T18:03:12.201+00:00
- Archive captured
- 2026-05-09T18:03:37.568974+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
"record": {
"id": "c31ffde4-2fba-40f3-a882-59eab8ac7557",
"url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/dokusenkinshiho-dian-tong-gurupu-20260311",
"company_name_original": "株式会社電通グループ",
"company_name_registry": null,
"corporate_number": null,
"law": {
"ja": "独占禁止法",
"en": "Antimonopoly Act"
},
"action_type": {
"ja": "課徴金納付命令",
"en": "Surcharge Payment Order"
},
"authority": {
"ja": "公正取引委員会",
"en": "Japan Fair Trade Commission"
}
},
"entity_match": {
"status": "unresolved",
"confidence": 85,
"method": "nta_strict_name_nationally_unique",
"method_label": "nta_strict_name_nationally_unique",
"notes": "NTA full-download lookup found a nationally unique exact registered-name candidate (株式会社電通グループ). No Corporate Number was present in the disclosure, so this remains a likely match."
},
"review": {
"status": "unreviewed",
"label": "Machine extracted"
},
"compliance_context": {
"severity": "Medium-high",
"actionMeaning": "A formal administrative order requiring payment of a monetary surcharge.",
"practicalNote": "Review the amount, covered conduct, recurrence history, and remediation evidence before making a risk decision.",
"lawContext": "Competition law covering private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade, unfair trade practices, and related conduct."
},
"evidence": {
"recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/dokusenkinshiho-dian-tong-gurupu-20260311",
"officialSourceUrl": "https://www.jftc.go.jp/houdou/pressrelease/2026/mar/260311_daiichi.html",
"officialDocumentUrl": null,
"archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/9cc586cf4dynju3k",
"archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.jftc.go.jp/houdou/pressrelease/2026/mar/260311_daiichi.html",
"archiveCapturedAt": "2026-05-09T18:03:37.568974+00:00",
"extractedAt": "2026-05-09T18:03:12.201+00:00",
"translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:32:47.733+00:00",
"evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-05-09T18:03:12.201+00:00",
"generatedAt": "2026-09-16T10:40:18.423Z"
},
"limitations": [
"RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
"English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
"Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
]
}The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.