Enforcement record
Suspension from Bidding disclosure naming 鹿島道路（株）
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Suspension from Bidding
Law
Suspension from Bidding Measures
Authority
Kinki Regional Development Bureau
Action date
11 April 2025
RegBase evidence report
Japanese public-record enforcement check
Saveable record of the published action, regulator source, source status, and review notes for internal compliance files.
- Report ID
- RB-EN-ENFORCEMENT-8B33EC49-416E-4BB-202607131129
- Generated at
- 13 July 2026 at 20:29
- Record URL
- https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/8b33ec49-416e-4bb8-8242-6ef5f1f73dde
1. Review Summary
| Disclosure name | 鹿島道路（株） | Corporate Number | Not stated in the disclosure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement record | 1 record | Other confirmed records for this company | Outside this report's scope |
| Action date | 11 April 2025 | Authority | Kinki Regional Development Bureau |
| Law | Suspension from Bidding Measures | Action type | Suspension from Bidding |
| Source status | Preserved public-source archive recorded | ||
This report summarizes public Japanese government disclosure data held by RegBase. It is not a credit score, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or adverse-media determination. Confirm important decisions against the linked official Japanese source.
2. Published Information
| Published name | 鹿島道路（株） |
|---|
3. Enforcement Record
| Target name in disclosure | 鹿島道路（株） |
|---|---|
| Authority | Kinki Regional Development Bureau (近畿地方整備局) |
| Law / action type | Suspension from Bidding Measures / Suspension from Bidding |
| Action / announcement date | Action: 11 April 2025 / Announcement: 10 July 2026 |
| English summary | Kashima Road Co., Ltd. was subject to a bidding suspension by the Kinki Regional Development Bureau from April 11, 2025, to July 18, 2025, following violations related to asphalt pavement works. The company had contracted and executed asphalt pavement projects for the Naniwa National Highway Office and Osaka National Highway Office, where contract documents specified the use of asphalt mixture with new aggregate. However, investigations by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism revealed that the company used asphalt containing recycled aggregate without prior consultation with the client, and falsely marked recycled asphalt as new in shipping documents. The company's asphalt mixture plant manager was aware of this discrepancy. Additionally, the company supplied asphalt mixture to other projects ordered by the Wakayama River and National Highway Office, Rokko Sabo Office, and Osaka National Highway Office, where similar violations occurred, including mislabeling recycled asphalt as new in shipping documents. The violations involved the use of recycled materials contrary to contractual specifications, and the company was found to have knowingly misrepresented the material in shipping documentation. |
| Original Japanese text | ○当該業者は、浪速国道事務所発注の「第二阪和国道大谷地区舗装他工事」、「第二阪和国道深日地区舗装他工事」、大阪国道事務所発注の「国道２６号宿院地区舗装修繕工事」において、アスファルト舗装工事を受注し、施工したが、各事務所と当該業者の契約図書（特記仕様書、設計図面等）で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材（新規アスファルト合材）の使用を指定」されていたものの、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、発注者との協議を経ずに、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材（再生アスファルト合材）を使用」して工事を行っていたことが判明した。 当該業者の合材製造所長等は、同社が製造するアスファルト合材について、新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに、再生アスファルト合材であることを認識していた。 ○当該業者は、和歌山河川国道事務所発注の「国道４２号和歌浦地区管路敷設他工事」、「国道４２号古江見地区管路敷設工事」、六甲砂防事務所発注の「二楽上流堰堤改築工事」及び大阪国道事務所発注の「国道１号他舗装修繕工事」において、アスファルト舗装工事に使用するアスファルト合材を当該工事の受注者に対し出荷していた。 これらの工事においては、各事務所と当該工事の受注者の契約図書（特記仕様書、設計図面等）で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材（新規アスファルト合材）の使用を指定」されており、受注者からも鹿島道路に対し「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材（新規アスファルト合材）を指定」されていた。しかし、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、当該業者は、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材（再生アスファルト合材）を使用」し、かつ、製造した「再生アスファルト合材」を出荷伝票には「新規アスファルト合材」と明示したうえで、当該工事の受注者へ出荷していたことが判明した。 当該業者の合材製造所長等は、同社が出荷するアスファルト合材について、新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに、再生アスファルト合材であることを認識していた。 |
| Official source | https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=80 |
| Source archive | https://kiroku.today/a/429e088b60ijw25j |
| Extraction / evidence timestamps | Extracted: 13 July 2026 at 08:38 / Evidence checked: 13 July 2026 at 08:38 / Archive captured: 13 July 2026 at 10:45 |
4. Business Location and Permit Details
| Business location address | 東京都文京区 |
|---|---|
| Action period | 令和7年4月11日～令和7年7月18日 |
| Overview page | https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=80 |
| https://www.kkr.mlit.go.jp/news/top/press/rirsjh0000004gm3-att/20250411-3yuusikakugyousyasimeiteisi.pdf |
5. Other Confirmed Records for This Company
This report covers the single government disclosure shown on this page.
Reviewer Notes
| Reviewer | Team / company | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Review purpose | |||
| Additional notes | |||
- □ Official source URL or archived source was checked.
- □ Corporate Number, address, or other identifiers were reviewed to avoid confusing similarly named entities.
- □ This document is understood as a public-record evidence file, not a credit decision or legal opinion.
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Free report
Save the disclosure record naming 鹿島道路（株）
Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.
Preserved evidence by Kiroku
Review the preserved source for 鹿島道路（株）
Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.
For developers: JSON integration details
You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.
Action summary
- Company
- 鹿島道路（株）Japanese onlyOriginal: 鹿島道路（株）
- Governing law
- Suspension from Bidding Measures指名停止措置
- Action type
- Suspension from Bidding指名停止
- Action date
- 11 April 2025
- Issuing authority
- Kinki Regional Development Bureau近畿地方整備局
- Industry context
- 公共工事指名停止
Violation
Kashima Road Co., Ltd. was subject to a bidding suspension by the Kinki Regional Development Bureau from April 11, 2025, to July 18, 2025, following violations related to asphalt pavement works. The company had contracted and executed asphalt pavement projects for the Naniwa National Highway Office and Osaka National Highway Office, where contract documents specified the use of asphalt mixture with new aggregate. However, investigations by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism revealed that the company used asphalt containing recycled aggregate without prior consultation with the client, and falsely marked recycled asphalt as new in shipping documents. The company's asphalt mixture plant manager was aware of this discrepancy. Additionally, the company supplied asphalt mixture to other projects ordered by the Wakayama River and National Highway Office, Rokko Sabo Office, and Osaka National Highway Office, where similar violations occurred, including mislabeling recycled asphalt as new in shipping documents. The violations involved the use of recycled materials contrary to contractual specifications, and the company was found to have knowingly misrepresented the material in shipping documentation.
Show original Japanese text
○当該業者は、浪速国道事務所発注の「第二阪和国道大谷地区舗装他工事」、「第二阪和国道深日地区舗装他工事」、大阪国道事務所発注の「国道２６号宿院地区舗装修繕工事」において、アスファルト舗装工事を受注し、施工したが、各事務所と当該業者の契約図書（特記仕様書、設計図面等）で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材（新規アスファルト合材）の使用を指定」されていたものの、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、発注者との協議を経ずに、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材（再生アスファルト合材）を使用」して工事を行っていたことが判明した。 当該業者の合材製造所長等は、同社が製造するアスファルト合材について、新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに、再生アスファルト合材であることを認識していた。 ○当該業者は、和歌山河川国道事務所発注の「国道４２号和歌浦地区管路敷設他工事」、「国道４２号古江見地区管路敷設工事」、六甲砂防事務所発注の「二楽上流堰堤改築工事」及び大阪国道事務所発注の「国道１号他舗装修繕工事」において、アスファルト舗装工事に使用するアスファルト合材を当該工事の受注者に対し出荷していた。 これらの工事においては、各事務所と当該工事の受注者の契約図書（特記仕様書、設計図面等）で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材（新規アスファルト合材）の使用を指定」されており、受注者からも鹿島道路に対し「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材（新規アスファルト合材）を指定」されていた。しかし、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、当該業者は、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材（再生アスファルト合材）を使用」し、かつ、製造した「再生アスファルト合材」を出荷伝票には「新規アスファルト合材」と明示したうえで、当該工事の受注者へ出荷していたことが判明した。 当該業者の合材製造所長等は、同社が出荷するアスファルト合材について、新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに、再生アスファルト合材であることを認識していた。
Business location and permit details
- Business location address
- 東京都文京区
- Action period
- 令和7年4月11日～令和7年7月18日
- Overview page
- https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=80
- https://www.kkr.mlit.go.jp/news/top/press/rirsjh0000004gm3-att/20250411-3yuusikakugyousyasimeiteisi.pdf
These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.
Compliance context
Medium-highA public-sector authority suspended the company from bidding for covered public contracts.
Japanese regulatory disclosure under Suspension from Bidding Measures.
Verify the issuing authority, suspension period, and whether the reason affects your procurement risk assessment.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Evidence pack
- Extracted at
- 2026-07-12T23:38:56.232+00:00
- Evidence checked
- 2026-07-12T23:38:56.232+00:00
- Archive captured
- 2026-07-13T01:45:01.378361+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
"record": {
"id": "8b33ec49-416e-4bb8-8242-6ef5f1f73dde",
"url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/8b33ec49-416e-4bb8-8242-6ef5f1f73dde",
"company_name_original": "鹿島道路（株）",
"company_name_registry": null,
"corporate_number": null,
"law": {
"ja": "指名停止措置",
"en": "Suspension from Bidding Measures"
},
"action_type": {
"ja": "指名停止",
"en": "Suspension from Bidding"
},
"authority": {
"ja": "近畿地方整備局",
"en": "Kinki Regional Development Bureau"
}
},
"entity_match": {
"status": "unresolved",
"confidence": 0,
"method": "registry_attempt_deferred",
"method_label": "registry_attempt_deferred",
"notes": "法人台帳の候補集合を完全に確認できなかったため、再照合が必要です。"
},
"review": {
"status": "needs_review",
"label": "Needs review"
},
"compliance_context": {
"severity": "Medium-high",
"actionMeaning": "A public-sector authority suspended the company from bidding for covered public contracts.",
"practicalNote": "Verify the issuing authority, suspension period, and whether the reason affects your procurement risk assessment.",
"lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Suspension from Bidding Measures."
},
"evidence": {
"recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/8b33ec49-416e-4bb8-8242-6ef5f1f73dde",
"officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=80",
"officialDocumentUrl": "https://www.kkr.mlit.go.jp/news/top/press/rirsjh0000004gm3-att/20250411-3yuusikakugyousyasimeiteisi.pdf",
"archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/429e088b60ijw25j",
"archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.kkr.mlit.go.jp/news/top/press/rirsjh0000004gm3-att/20250411-3yuusikakugyousyasimeiteisi.pdf",
"archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-13T01:45:01.378361+00:00",
"extractedAt": "2026-07-12T23:38:56.232+00:00",
"translatedAt": "2026-07-10T10:30:53.815+00:00",
"evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-12T23:38:56.232+00:00",
"generatedAt": "2026-07-13T11:29:40.467Z"
},
"limitations": [
"RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
"English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
"Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
]
}The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.