Enforcement record
Suspension from Bidding disclosure naming (株)NIPPO
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Suspension from Bidding
Law
Suspension from Bidding Measures
Authority
Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau
Action date
11 April 2025
RegBase evidence report
Japanese public-record enforcement check
Saveable record of the published action, regulator source, source status, and review notes for internal compliance files.
- Report ID
- RB-EN-ENFORCEMENT-22519180-EE22-412-202607131236
- Generated at
- 13 July 2026 at 21:36
- Record URL
- https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/22519180-ee22-412d-86df-740fa2e59c3b
1. Review Summary
| Disclosure name | (株)NIPPO | Corporate Number | Not stated in the disclosure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement record | 1 record | Other confirmed records for this company | Outside this report's scope |
| Action date | 11 April 2025 | Authority | Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau |
| Law | Suspension from Bidding Measures | Action type | Suspension from Bidding |
| Source status | Preserved public-source archive recorded | ||
This report summarizes public Japanese government disclosure data held by RegBase. It is not a credit score, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or adverse-media determination. Confirm important decisions against the linked official Japanese source.
2. Published Information
| Published name | (株)NIPPO |
|---|
3. Enforcement Record
| Target name in disclosure | (株)NIPPO |
|---|---|
| Authority | Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau (北海道開発局) |
| Law / action type | Suspension from Bidding Measures / Suspension from Bidding |
| Action / announcement date | Action: 11 April 2025 / Announcement: 10 July 2026 |
| English summary | (株)NIPPO was subject to a suspension from bidding on projects ordered by the Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku, Chubu, Kinki, and Chugoku Regional Development Bureaus, as well as the Tokyo Aeronautical Bureau, from April 11 to July 18, 2025. The suspension was imposed because it was found that the company used asphalt mixture containing recycled aggregate instead of the specified new aggregate in asphalt paving works. Although the contract documents (special specifications, design drawings, etc.) mandated the use of asphalt mixture with new aggregate, investigations by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism revealed that the company, without consulting the client, used asphalt mixture containing recycled aggregate. The manufacturing plant associated with the company also shipped recycled asphalt mixture labeled as new asphalt mixture on shipping slips. The company received management reports indicating that the asphalt mixture supplied should have been new asphalt mixture but recognized the possibility of it being recycled asphalt mixture. However, it failed to take appropriate measures to prevent such issues, thus breaching its duty to avoid the violation. Additionally, the company's affiliated plant supplied asphalt mixture to various projects, also labeled as new asphalt mixture despite investigations showing it contained recycled aggregate. The company, having close capital and personnel ties with the plant, was aware of the potential mislabeling but did not act to ensure proper management. |
| Original Japanese text | 当該業者は、東北地方整備局・関東地方整備局・北陸地方整備局・中部地方整備局・近畿地方整備局・中国地方整備局、東京航空局発注の工事において、アスファルト工事を施工したが、設計図書で指定したアスファルト合材と異なる再生骨材が混入したアスファルト合材を使用したことが判明した。 これらの工事においては、契約図書(特記仕様書、設計図面等)で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材(新規アスファルト合材)の使用を指定」されていたものの、当該業者は、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、発注者との協議を経ずに、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材(再生アスファルト合材)を使用」し、かつ、系列プラント会社は、製造した「再生アスファルト合材」を出荷伝票には「新規アスファルト合材」と明示したうえで、当該業者へ出荷していたことが判明した。 当該業者は、系列プラント会社から管理指標実績等の報告を受け、同社から納入されたアスファルト合材が新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに再生骨材を含む可能性を認識できたが、系列プラント会社による上記の行為を防止するための適切な対応を怠り、結果回避義務を果たさなかった。 また、当該業者の系列プラント会社は、東北地方整備局・関東地方整備局・北陸地方整備局・中部地方整備局・近畿地方整備局・中国地方整備局発注の工事において、アスファルト舗装工事に使用するアスファルト合材を当該工事の受注者に対し出荷していたが、契約図書(特記仕様書、設計図面等)で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材(新規アスファルト合材)の使用を指定」されており、受注者からも「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材(新規アスファルト合材)を指定」されていたものの、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材(再生アスファルト合材)を使用」し、かつ、製造した「再生アスファルト合材」を出荷伝票には「新規アスファルト合材」と明示したうえで、当該工事の受注者へ出荷していたことが判明した。 当該業者は、系列プラント会社と密接な資本・人的関係にあり、また、同社から管理指標実績等の報告を受け、同社が出荷したアスファルト合材について、新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに再生アスファルト合材である可能性を認識できたが、その適正な管理のために必要な行為を取らなかった。 |
| Official source | https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=36 |
| Source archive | https://kiroku.today/a/4f1e9eba0dijvzay |
| Extraction / evidence timestamps | Extracted: 13 July 2026 at 08:38 / Evidence checked: 13 July 2026 at 08:38 / Archive captured: 13 July 2026 at 10:43 |
4. Business Location and Permit Details
| Business location address | 東京都中央区 |
|---|---|
| Action period | 令和7年4月11日~令和7年7月18日 |
| Overview page | https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=36 |
| https://www.hkd.mlit.go.jp/ky/ki/kaikei/k5m5qg0000003u0s-att/k5m5qg0000004m65.pdf |
5. Other Confirmed Records for This Company
This report covers the single government disclosure shown on this page.
Reviewer Notes
| Reviewer | Team / company | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Review purpose | |||
| Additional notes | |||
- □ Official source URL or archived source was checked.
- □ Corporate Number, address, or other identifiers were reviewed to avoid confusing similarly named entities.
- □ This document is understood as a public-record evidence file, not a credit decision or legal opinion.
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Free report
Save the disclosure record naming (株)NIPPO
Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.
Preserved evidence by Kiroku
Review the preserved source for (株)NIPPO
Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.
For developers: JSON integration details
You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.
Action summary
- Company
- (株)NIPPOJapanese onlyOriginal: (株)NIPPO
- Governing law
- Suspension from Bidding Measures指名停止措置
- Action type
- Suspension from Bidding指名停止
- Action date
- 11 April 2025
- Issuing authority
- Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau北海道開発局
- Industry context
- 公共工事指名停止
Violation
(株)NIPPO was subject to a suspension from bidding on projects ordered by the Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku, Chubu, Kinki, and Chugoku Regional Development Bureaus, as well as the Tokyo Aeronautical Bureau, from April 11 to July 18, 2025. The suspension was imposed because it was found that the company used asphalt mixture containing recycled aggregate instead of the specified new aggregate in asphalt paving works. Although the contract documents (special specifications, design drawings, etc.) mandated the use of asphalt mixture with new aggregate, investigations by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism revealed that the company, without consulting the client, used asphalt mixture containing recycled aggregate. The manufacturing plant associated with the company also shipped recycled asphalt mixture labeled as new asphalt mixture on shipping slips. The company received management reports indicating that the asphalt mixture supplied should have been new asphalt mixture but recognized the possibility of it being recycled asphalt mixture. However, it failed to take appropriate measures to prevent such issues, thus breaching its duty to avoid the violation. Additionally, the company's affiliated plant supplied asphalt mixture to various projects, also labeled as new asphalt mixture despite investigations showing it contained recycled aggregate. The company, having close capital and personnel ties with the plant, was aware of the potential mislabeling but did not act to ensure proper management.
Show original Japanese text
当該業者は、東北地方整備局・関東地方整備局・北陸地方整備局・中部地方整備局・近畿地方整備局・中国地方整備局、東京航空局発注の工事において、アスファルト工事を施工したが、設計図書で指定したアスファルト合材と異なる再生骨材が混入したアスファルト合材を使用したことが判明した。 これらの工事においては、契約図書(特記仕様書、設計図面等)で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材(新規アスファルト合材)の使用を指定」されていたものの、当該業者は、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、発注者との協議を経ずに、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材(再生アスファルト合材)を使用」し、かつ、系列プラント会社は、製造した「再生アスファルト合材」を出荷伝票には「新規アスファルト合材」と明示したうえで、当該業者へ出荷していたことが判明した。 当該業者は、系列プラント会社から管理指標実績等の報告を受け、同社から納入されたアスファルト合材が新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに再生骨材を含む可能性を認識できたが、系列プラント会社による上記の行為を防止するための適切な対応を怠り、結果回避義務を果たさなかった。 また、当該業者の系列プラント会社は、東北地方整備局・関東地方整備局・北陸地方整備局・中部地方整備局・近畿地方整備局・中国地方整備局発注の工事において、アスファルト舗装工事に使用するアスファルト合材を当該工事の受注者に対し出荷していたが、契約図書(特記仕様書、設計図面等)で「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材(新規アスファルト合材)の使用を指定」されており、受注者からも「新規骨材によるアスファルト合材(新規アスファルト合材)を指定」されていたものの、国土交通省が実施した調査の結果において、「再生骨材を含むアスファルト合材(再生アスファルト合材)を使用」し、かつ、製造した「再生アスファルト合材」を出荷伝票には「新規アスファルト合材」と明示したうえで、当該工事の受注者へ出荷していたことが判明した。 当該業者は、系列プラント会社と密接な資本・人的関係にあり、また、同社から管理指標実績等の報告を受け、同社が出荷したアスファルト合材について、新規アスファルト合材でなければならないのに再生アスファルト合材である可能性を認識できたが、その適正な管理のために必要な行為を取らなかった。
Business location and permit details
- Business location address
- 東京都中央区
- Action period
- 令和7年4月11日~令和7年7月18日
- Overview page
- https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=36
- https://www.hkd.mlit.go.jp/ky/ki/kaikei/k5m5qg0000003u0s-att/k5m5qg0000004m65.pdf
These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.
Compliance context
Medium-highA public-sector authority suspended the company from bidding for covered public contracts.
Japanese regulatory disclosure under Suspension from Bidding Measures.
Verify the issuing authority, suspension period, and whether the reason affects your procurement risk assessment.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Evidence pack
- Extracted at
- 2026-07-12T23:38:24.503+00:00
- Evidence checked
- 2026-07-12T23:38:24.503+00:00
- Archive captured
- 2026-07-13T01:43:19.899154+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
"record": {
"id": "22519180-ee22-412d-86df-740fa2e59c3b",
"url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/22519180-ee22-412d-86df-740fa2e59c3b",
"company_name_original": "(株)NIPPO",
"company_name_registry": null,
"corporate_number": null,
"law": {
"ja": "指名停止措置",
"en": "Suspension from Bidding Measures"
},
"action_type": {
"ja": "指名停止",
"en": "Suspension from Bidding"
},
"authority": {
"ja": "北海道開発局",
"en": "Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau"
}
},
"entity_match": {
"status": "unresolved",
"confidence": 0,
"method": "registry_attempt_deferred",
"method_label": "registry_attempt_deferred",
"notes": "法人台帳の候補集合を完全に確認できなかったため、再照合が必要です。"
},
"review": {
"status": "needs_review",
"label": "Needs review"
},
"compliance_context": {
"severity": "Medium-high",
"actionMeaning": "A public-sector authority suspended the company from bidding for covered public contracts.",
"practicalNote": "Verify the issuing authority, suspension period, and whether the reason affects your procurement risk assessment.",
"lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Suspension from Bidding Measures."
},
"evidence": {
"recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/22519180-ee22-412d-86df-740fa2e59c3b",
"officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=shimeiteishi&EID=search&no=36",
"officialDocumentUrl": "https://www.hkd.mlit.go.jp/ky/ki/kaikei/k5m5qg0000003u0s-att/k5m5qg0000004m65.pdf",
"archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/4f1e9eba0dijvzay",
"archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.hkd.mlit.go.jp/ky/ki/kaikei/k5m5qg0000003u0s-att/k5m5qg0000004m65.pdf",
"archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-13T01:43:19.899154+00:00",
"extractedAt": "2026-07-12T23:38:24.503+00:00",
"translatedAt": "2026-07-10T10:20:37.79+00:00",
"evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-12T23:38:24.503+00:00",
"generatedAt": "2026-07-13T12:36:20.248Z"
},
"limitations": [
"RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
"English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
"Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
]
}The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.