{"data":{"companies":[{"id":"1db26e1f-ed5e-4a86-9d69-43ae8e5402e6","name":"株式会社北陽","name_en":null,"name_en_source":null,"corporate_number":"2120001167312","identity_status":"verified","slug":null,"url":"https://regbase.jp/company/1db26e1f-ed5e-4a86-9d69-43ae8e5402e6","prefecture":"大阪府","address":"大阪府大阪市東淀川区","industry":"建設業","status":"active","is_listed":false,"enforcement_count":2,"latest_action_date":"2025-03-31","kanpo_count":0,"latest_kanpo_publication_date":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-18T05:55:41.138151+00:00"}],"enforcements":[{"id":"a99b4039-9df2-453a-9e03-f29164344e65","company_name":"株式会社北陽","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"2120001167312","authority":"大阪府","authorities":["大阪府"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2025-03-31","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"(1) 当該建設業者は、大阪市発注の３件の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第26条第３項の規定に違反して、他の工事現場に専任の主任技術者として配置すべきＡ氏を主任技術者の配置に専任を要する本件工事の工事現場に非専任の主任技術者として配置した。 (2) 当該建設業者は、経営規模等評価の申請において、建設業法第27条の26第２項から第４項までの規定に違反して、「工事経歴書」に本件工事うち２件の工事の工事現場に配置した主任技術者をＡ氏と記載すべきところ、Ｂ氏と記載をし、また、株式会社ケイテックから請け負った当該工事を、建設業法第22条第１項の規定に違反して、一括して株式会社タケムラに請け負わせていたが、当該工事を実質的に行っているとは認められないため当該工事の金額を完成工事高に含めて記載するべきではないところ、当該工事を施工したとして当該工事の金額が鋼構造物工事の完成工事高に含まれるとする記載をした。","violation_summary_en":"(1) The construction company violated Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Construction Business Act by assigning Mr. A as a non-exclusive chief technician at the construction site of the project requiring exclusive assignment, instead of as a dedicated chief technician at other sites, for three projects ordered by Osaka City. (2) The company also violated Articles 27-26, Paragraphs 2 to 4 of the Construction Business Act by incorrectly listing Mr. A as the chief technician at two project sites in the 'Construction Record' when it should have listed Mr. B, and by improperly consolidating the contract for the project subcontracted from K-Tech Corporation under the Act, contrary to Article 22, Paragraph 1, of the Act, despite not actually performing the work, and thus should not have included the project amount in the completed construction cost. Instead, the company recorded that the project was executed, and included its amount in the steel structure work’s completed construction cost.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1615","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-bei-yang-20250331-2"},{"id":"f2a1c1bc-08d6-4690-be19-dc8f8e36234a","company_name":"株式会社北陽","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"2120001167312","authority":"大阪府","authorities":["大阪府"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["営業停止"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"営業停止","action_date":"2025-03-31","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"(1) 当該建設業者は、大阪市発注の工事において、建設業法第26条第３項の規定に違反して、他の工事現場に専任の主任技術者として配置すべきＡ氏を主任技術者の配置に専任を要する本件工事の工事現場に非専任の主任技術者として配置する（加えて、他社の現場代理人でもあった）など適格な主任技術者を配置せず、建設業法第22条第１項の規定に違反して、その請け負った建設工事を一括して株式会社タケムラに請け負わせた。 (2) 当該建設業者は、経営規模等評価の申請において、建設業法第27条の26第２項から第４項までの規定に違反して、Ａ氏が他社の工事の現場代理人となっていたにもかかわらず、同氏を「技術職員名簿」に記載をした。 これにより得た経営事項審査結果を大阪市等に提出し、大阪市等がその結果を建築一式工事に係る資格審査に用いた。","violation_summary_en":"(1) The construction company violated Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Building Business Act by assigning Mr. A, who should have been a dedicated chief technician at another construction site, as a non-dedicated chief technician at the construction site for which he was required to be dedicated, in connection with a project ordered by Osaka City. Additionally, the company failed to assign a qualified chief technician, as it also had Mr. A serve as a site supervisor for another company. The company also violated Article 22, Paragraph 1 of the Building Business Act by subcontracting the entire construction project to Takemura Co., Ltd. (2) The company submitted an application for management scale evaluation in violation of Articles 27-26, Paragraphs 2 to 4 of the Building Business Act by listing Mr. A in the","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1616","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-bei-yang-20250331"}]},"meta":{"query":"2120001167312","count":3,"api_docs":"https://regbase.jp/api-docs","openapi_schema":"https://regbase.jp/api/openapi.json","llms":"https://regbase.jp/llms.txt","usage_note":"Use RegBase for targeted public-source screening of Japanese companies and enforcement records. Absence of returned records is not a clearance, legal opinion, sanctions result, or credit decision.","rate_limit":{"limit":10,"window_seconds":60,"remaining":5,"reset_at":"2026-08-31T01:20:50.690Z"},"daily_rate_limit":{"limit":300,"window_seconds":86400,"remaining":51,"reset_at":"2026-09-01T01:19:50.690Z"}}}