{"data":{"companies":[{"id":"13be4477-1967-4577-a0d4-43903bad6148","name":"株式会社大盛工業株式","name_en":null,"name_en_source":null,"corporate_number":null,"slug":"da-sheng-gong-ye-zhu-shi","url":"https://regbase.jp/company/da-sheng-gong-ye-zhu-shi","prefecture":null,"address":null,"industry":null,"status":"active","is_listed":false,"enforcement_count":1,"latest_action_date":"2024-04-25","kanpo_count":0,"latest_kanpo_publication_date":null,"updated_at":"2026-04-25T01:41:15.130836+00:00"}],"enforcements":[{"id":"ee10da16-4562-421f-96f1-2f4409187b7c","company_name":"株式会社大盛工業株式","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"金融庁","law_name":"金融商品取引法","action_type":"課徴金納付命令","action_date":"2024-04-25","announcement_date":"2026-03-13","violation_summary":"証券取引等監視委員会から（株）大盛工業株式に係る安定操作の検査結果に基づく課徴金納付命令の勧告を受け、審判手続開始の決定を行ったところ、被審人から課徴金に係る金融商品取引法第178条第１項第15号に掲げる事実及び納付すべき課徴金の額を認める旨の答弁書の提出があり、これを受けた審判官から金商法第185条の６の規定に基づき、課徴金の納付を命ずる旨の決定案が提出されたことから、決定を行った。","violation_summary_en":"The Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission recommended a payment order for a surcharge based on the results of an inspection related to stabilization operations concerning Oomori Kogyo Co., Ltd. After initiating the adjudication process, the respondent submitted a statement acknowledging the facts listed in Article 178-1, Item 15 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the amount of surcharge to be paid. In response, the presiding judge submitted a draft decision to order the payment of the surcharge pursuant to Article 185-6 of the same Act. Consequently, a decision was made to impose the surcharge.","penalty_amount":2280000,"is_verified":false,"source_url":"https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/r5/shouken/20240531-1.html","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kinshoho-da-sheng-gong-ye-zhu-shi-20240425"}]},"meta":{"query":"株式会社大盛工業株式","count":2,"api_docs":"https://regbase.jp/api-docs","openapi_schema":"https://regbase.jp/api/openapi.json","llms":"https://regbase.jp/llms.txt","usage_note":"Use RegBase for targeted public-source screening of Japanese companies and enforcement records. Absence of returned records is not a clearance, legal opinion, sanctions result, or credit decision.","rate_limit":{"limit":10,"window_seconds":60,"remaining":7,"reset_at":"2026-05-21T22:57:51.822Z"},"daily_rate_limit":{"limit":300,"window_seconds":86400,"remaining":266,"reset_at":"2026-05-22T22:56:51.822Z"}}}