{"data":[{"id":"f03a6789-8fcc-4c0a-88c6-d95ac63fd8f5","company_name":"クライム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"山口労働局","authorities":["山口労働局"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["送検・公表"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":3,"law_name":"労働安全衛生法","action_type":"送検・公表","action_date":"2026-06-17","announcement_date":"2026-06-17","violation_summary":"つり足場の組立て作業において、足場の組 立て等作業主任者が職務を行わなかったも の","violation_summary_en":"The company 'クライム' was prosecuted and publicly announced for violations of the Labor Safety and Health Act by the Yamaguchi Labor Bureau. The violation involved failure to perform duties related to the supervisor of scaffold assembly work.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":0,"method":"candidate_set_incomplete","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://jsite.mhlw.go.jp/yamaguchi-roudoukyoku/content/contents/002698246.pdf","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/roudou-anzen-eiseiho-kuraimu-20260617"},{"id":"a9a53a44-97fa-417b-bd94-a9608a1ecb72","company_name":"株式会社ライム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"神奈川労働局","authorities":["神奈川労働局"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["雇用調整助成金不正受給公表"],"regional_record_count":2,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"雇用関係助成金","action_type":"雇用調整助成金不正受給公表","action_date":"2025-08-27","announcement_date":"2025-09-11","violation_summary":"休業していないにもかかわらず、休業したとする書類を作成し、当該助成金を不正に受給したもの。","violation_summary_en":null,"penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":25,"method":"multiple_strict_name_candidates","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://jsite.mhlw.go.jp/kanagawa-roudoukyoku/content/contents/002212654.pdf","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/subsidy-fraud-raimu-20250827-1e9c9b6d"},{"id":"19f58a9c-f4f2-47d7-a083-12b179748e40","company_name":"（株）ライムイシモト","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"長崎県","authorities":["長崎県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["営業停止"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"営業停止","action_date":"2025-06-13","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"（株）ライムイシモトは、長崎県発注工事「長崎魚市場西棟４期建設工事（２工区）」に関して、２次下請けの立場で工事を施工したとして、経営事項等評価申請書に完工高を計上し審査を受けた。 しかし、関係各社の営業所調査において、（株）ライムイシモトの工事施工実績はないと回答を受け、（株）ライムイシモトへ営業所調査を実施したが、工事を施工したことを証する書類は提出されなかった。よって、当該工事に関しては完工高に計上してはならず、経営事項等評価申請において、水増しした完成工事高で虚偽の申請を行っていたことを確認した。 このことが、建設業法第２８条第１項第２号に該当し、監督処分の対象となる。","violation_summary_en":"Lime Ishimoto Co., Ltd. was found to have falsely reported the completed construction amount in the management and business evaluation application for the Nagasaki Fish Market West Building Phase 4 (Section 2) project, which was ordered by Nagasaki Prefecture. The company claimed to have performed the work as a secondary subcontractor. However, investigations at related companies' offices revealed no record of Lime Ishimoto's construction performance. An on-site investigation at Lime Ishimoto's office also failed to produce documents proving the company performed the work. Consequently, the reported completion amount for this project must not be included, and it was confirmed that the company submitted a false application with inflated completed construction amounts. This constitutes a violation of Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act and is subject to administrative disposition.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":95,"method":"nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1703","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-raimuisimoto-20250613"},{"id":"95904be9-f935-4056-8b13-f7d2cdeb3b56","company_name":"株式会社プライムステージ","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"大阪府","authorities":["大阪府"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["業務改善命令"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"旅行業法","action_type":"業務改善命令","action_date":"2024-09-30","announcement_date":"2024-09-30","violation_summary":"令和2年11月7日の旅行において、貸切バスの運送に関して発生するあっせん手数料により、貸切バス事業者が本来収受すべき運賃・料金が実質的に収受できず、安全を確保するための経費が阻害されたことから、当該バス事業者が道路運送法第10条違反として行政処分を受け、当該旅行業者はその取引に関与した。","violation_summary_en":"On the trip on November 7, 2020, the charter bus operator was subject to administrative disposition for violating Article 10 of the Road Transport Act due to the interference of brokerage fees in the transportation of the charter bus, which prevented the operator from collecting the fare and charges they should have received and hindered expenses necessary for safety. The travel agency involved in the transaction was also implicated.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":0,"method":"candidate_set_incomplete","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/content/001913487.xlsx","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/ryokogyoho-puraimusutezi-20240930"},{"id":"8ddb5ac2-4754-4812-8c5a-bb2f797d4e97","company_name":"株式会社プライム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"4080101018285","authority":"東京都","authorities":["東京都"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2023-10-31","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"令和２年６月20日、東京都港区内の工事現場において、株式会社プライムの現場代理人は、同ビル５階床面から高さ2.7メートルに位置する６階床面開口部上に敷かれた足場板を架設通路として使用させるに当たり、同通路に高さ85センチメートル以上の手すり又はこれと同等以上の機能を有する設備及び高さ35センチメートル以上50センチメートル以下の桟又はこれと同等以上の機能を有する設備を設けなければならないのに、これを設けず、もって、労働者の労働災害を防止するため必要な措置を講じなかった。 以上のことが、労働安全衛生法第31条第1項、及び労働安全衛生規則（昭和47年労働省令第32号）第654条に違反し、労働安全衛生法第119条第１項及び第122条により株式会社プライム及び現場代理人が罰金刑に処せられた。 このことが、建設業法第28条第１項第３号に該当する。","violation_summary_en":"On June 20, 2020, Tokyo issued a directive to Prime Corporation for violations of the Building Industry Act related to safety measures at a construction site, resulting in fines for the company and its site manager.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=102","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-puraimu-20231031"},{"id":"79121a87-f751-49fc-b8e4-7f9381fd89cf","company_name":"株式会社クライム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"3240001050810","authority":"広島労働局","authorities":["広島労働局"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["雇用調整助成金不正受給公表"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"雇用関係助成金","action_type":"雇用調整助成金不正受給公表","action_date":"2022-10-11","announcement_date":"2022-10-28","violation_summary":"休業実績がないにもかかわらず、休業していたとする虚偽の申請書類を作成し、当該助成金を不正に受給","violation_summary_en":null,"penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":98,"method":"nta_strict_name_full_current_address","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（nta_strict_name_full_current_address）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://jsite.mhlw.go.jp/hiroshima-roudoukyoku/content/contents/002669281.pdf","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/subsidy-fraud-kuraimu-20221011-b295e3d9"},{"id":"a219425c-d358-4ebf-a870-07907177b359","company_name":"（株）プライム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"栃木労働局","authorities":["栃木労働局"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["送検・公表"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"労働安全衛生法","action_type":"送検・公表","action_date":"2021-05-14","announcement_date":"2021-05-14","violation_summary":"を設けていなかったもの 最終更新日：令和4年3月31日 架設通路の墜落の危険のある箇所に、危険 を防止するための設備を設けないまま、請 負人の労働者に使用をさせたもの 架設通路の墜落の危険のある箇所に、危険 神奈川県横浜市鶴","violation_summary_en":"Failure to install safety equipment at locations with fall hazards on scaffolding walkways, leading to workers being allowed to use the unsafe areas.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":60,"method":"linked_profile_without_source_identifier","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.niph.go.jp/h-crisis/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/20220502100734_content_000798929.pdf","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/roudou-anzen-eiseiho-puraimu-20210514"},{"id":"032c4286-0c14-4f43-881e-dccfbc390ac8","company_name":"株式会社ＦＸプライムbyＧＭＯ","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"証券取引等監視委員会","authorities":["証券取引等監視委員会"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["勧告"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"金融商品取引法","action_type":"勧告","action_date":"2020-08-04","announcement_date":"2026-03-11","violation_summary":"当社が提供する店頭外国為替保証金取引の取引ツールに係る当社システムは、成行注文の場合、顧客が発注した時点から約定処理がなされる時点までの間に為替相場の変動が生じた場合、発注時点の価格と実際の約定価格との価格差（以下「スリッページ」という。）の発生を排除できない仕様となっている。そして、当社は、当該システム仕様について、平成26年にスリッページに関して行った社内検討においてシステム部門責任者から報告を受け、取締役、法務コンプライアンス部長等で認識を共有していたほか、その後も顧客からスリッページが発生しているとの情報が寄せられており、少なくとも平成30年に寄せられた情報は代表取締役社長、取締役、部長、グループ長等で共有していた。","violation_summary_en":"The company's trading system for over-the-counter foreign exchange margin trading has a design that cannot eliminate the occurrence of slippage, which is the price difference between the order execution price and the initial order price, during the period from order placement to execution in the case of market orders. The company was aware of this system specification through internal reviews conducted in 2014 regarding slippage, reports from the system department head, and shared understanding among directors and legal compliance officers. Additionally, information from customers about the occurrence of slippage has been received, including at least in 2018, when such information was shared among the representative director, directors, managers, and group leaders. In an investigation commissioned to an external research company, Company A, it was confirmed that slippage had occurred multiple times in the company's system. Despite knowing this, the company did not take measures to verify the potential for slippage in its system, relying instead on referencing Company A's report, which did not include findings of multiple slippages, and published advertisements claiming \"No slippage (0%), according to Company A,\" which was factually inaccurate.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":false,"record_verified":false,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":85,"method":"nta_strict_name_nationally_unique","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"unreviewed","source_url":"https://www.fsa.go.jp/sesc/news/c_2020/2020/20200804-3.html","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kinshoho-fxpuraimubygmo-20200804"},{"id":"6474f0d4-e8c6-4032-9fcf-a6418059a33a","company_name":"株式会社ネオクライム 運営責任者 A","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"金融庁・財務局","authorities":["金融庁・財務局"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["警告書発出"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"金融商品取引法","action_type":"警告書発出","action_date":"2016-04-01","announcement_date":"2016-04-01","violation_summary":"インターネットを通じて、投資顧問契約に基づく助言の勧誘を行っていたもの。 当該業者が提供するサービスの名称は「株FestA（カブフェスタ）」である。","violation_summary_en":"Engaged in soliciting advice based on investment advisory contracts via the internet. The service provided by the company is called [KabuFestA].","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":60,"method":"source_name_only_no_registry_match","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://www.fsa.go.jp/ordinary/chuui/mutouroku.html","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kinshoho-neokuraimuyun-ying-ze-ren-zhe-a-20160401"},{"id":"657925c9-84be-467c-abe9-880e9143f323","company_name":"株式会社プライム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"金融庁・財務局","authorities":["金融庁・財務局"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["警告書発出"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"金融商品取引法","action_type":"警告書発出","action_date":"2013-07-01","announcement_date":"2013-07-01","violation_summary":"勧誘資料を送付したうえで、未公開株の買取りを行うとしていたもの。 代表者等の氏名は「不明」。 所在地は勧誘を受けた者からの聞き取りによるものであり、平成25年6月14日付で警告書を発出した「株式会社ブロード」と同一である。","violation_summary_en":"Sent solicitation materials and claimed to purchase unlisted shares. The name of the representative is unknown. The location was obtained from the person solicited and is the same as that of Kabushiki Kaisha Broad, which issued a warning letter on June 14, 2013.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":0,"method":"candidate_set_incomplete","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://www.fsa.go.jp/ordinary/chuui/mutouroku.html","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kinshoho-puraimu-20130701"}],"meta":{"query":"株式会社ライム","corporate_number":null,"law":null,"authority":null,"action_type":null,"count":10,"api_docs":"https://regbase.jp/api-docs","openapi_schema":"https://regbase.jp/api/openapi.json","llms":"https://regbase.jp/llms.txt","usage_note":"Use RegBase for targeted public-source screening of Japanese companies and enforcement records. Absence of returned records is not a clearance, legal opinion, sanctions result, or credit decision.","rate_limit":{"limit":10,"window_seconds":60,"remaining":5,"reset_at":"2026-08-06T23:17:17.064Z"},"daily_rate_limit":{"limit":300,"window_seconds":86400,"remaining":282,"reset_at":"2026-08-07T23:16:17.064Z"}}}