{"data":[{"id":"591ed813-2f42-458a-951a-2202a75c4970","company_name":"株式会社生立","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["免許取消"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"宅地建物取引業法","action_type":"免許取消","action_date":"2026-05-19","announcement_date":"2026-06-02","violation_summary":"事務所の所在地を確知できず、公報にてその旨を公告したが30日を経過しても申出がなかった。（法第67条第１項）","violation_summary_en":"The Okinawa Prefectural Government revoked the license of株式会社生立 on May 19, 2026, due to failure to notify the location of its office within 30 days after public notice, as required by Article 67, Paragraph 1 of the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":92,"method":"nta_strict_name_municipality_supported","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=takuti&EID=search&no=267","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/takken-gyoho-sheng-li-20260519"},{"id":"36c4c1da-f769-4e69-9d49-ecf69e0d775d","company_name":"光南建設株式会社","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"4360001008787","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["営業停止"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"営業停止","action_date":"2026-03-24","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"光南建設株式会社は、令和４年度から令和６年度の経営事項審査の申請に際し、実態と異なる内容を記載した工事経歴書及び技術職員名簿を提出していたことが、確認された。 また、その結果をもって、公共工事の発注者である沖縄県に対し、入札参加資格申請を行った。 このことは、建設業法第28条第１項第２号の規定に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"Konoan Construction Co., Ltd. was found to have submitted construction history documents and lists of technical personnel that contained false information when applying for the management review from 2022 to 2024. Based on this, the company applied for bid participation qualification with Okinawa Prefecture, the public works procurer. This is recognized as corresponding to the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=2028","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-guang-nan-jian-she-20260324"},{"id":"358a4a66-6e8c-43be-af8c-576e77eeaeed","company_name":"光南建設株式会社","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"4360001008787","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2026-03-24","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"光南建設株式会社は、営業所技術者が常勤せず、建設業法第７条第２号に掲げる基準を満たさなくなったにもかかわらず、事実発生日から２週間以内に必要な届出を行わなかった。 このことは、建設業法第11条第４項に違反し、同法第28条第１項本文に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"Kōnan Construction Co., Ltd. did not submit the necessary notification within two weeks of the fact occurrence, despite the fact that the site engineer was not permanently assigned and the standards listed in Article 7, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act were no longer met. This is recognized as a violation of Article 11, Paragraph 4 of the Construction Business Act and falls under the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1, main text of the same Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=2027","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-guang-nan-jian-she-20260324-2"},{"id":"330202db-132b-4f34-ae5d-5c193484d60b","company_name":"株式会社富士建設","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"3360001009134","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["営業停止"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"営業停止","action_date":"2026-03-24","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"富士建設株式会社は、令和４年度から令和６年度の経営事項審査の申請に際し、実態と異なる内容を記載した工事経歴書及び技術職員名簿を提出していたことが、確認された。 また、その結果をもって、公共工事の発注者である沖縄県に対し、入札参加資格申請を行った。 このことは、建設業法第28条第１項第２号の規定に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"Fujiken Sekou Co., Ltd. was found to have submitted construction history documents and lists of technical personnel that contained false information when applying for the management review from 2022 to 2024. Based on this, the company applied for bid participation qualification with Okinawa Prefecture, the public works procurer. This is recognized as corresponding to the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=2029","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-fu-shi-jian-she-20260324"},{"id":"f1201f71-fd40-40fc-aaca-fbbba142b1f8","company_name":"株式会社南山開発","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"8360001001672","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["営業停止"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"営業停止","action_date":"2026-03-24","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"株式会社南山開発は、令和４年度から令和６年度の経営事項審査の申請に際し、実態と異なる内容を記載した工事経歴書及び技術職員名簿を提出していたことが、確認された。 また、その結果をもって、公共工事の発注者である沖縄県に対し、入札参加資格申請を行った。 このことは、建設業法第28条第１項第２号の規定に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"Nanzan Kaihatsu Co., Ltd. was found to have submitted construction history documents and lists of technical personnel that contained false information when applying for management review from 2022 to 2024. Based on this, the company applied for bidding qualification with Okinawa Prefecture, the public works client. This is recognized as corresponding to the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=2030","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-nan-shan-kai-fa-20260324"},{"id":"450ff2d7-1803-497e-9177-2e82dbcb359d","company_name":"株式会社浦和工業","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"8360001030556","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["営業停止"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"営業停止","action_date":"2026-01-19","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"株式会社浦和工業は、令和６年７月４日、沖縄県沖縄市の民間改修工事現場において、高さ５メートル以上の構造の足場組立て作業を行うにあたり、労働者の作業の進行状況を監視せず、もって足場の組立等作業主任者の職務を行わせなかった。 また、高圧線に防護管を設置するなど感電による死傷事故の発生を防止すべき注意義務を怠り、必要な措置を講じず、同作業の進行状況を監視しなかった過失により、令和７年３月７日沖縄簡易裁判所から、労働安全衛生法違反及び業務上過失致死罪により罰金20万円（法人）、及び罰金50万円（個人）の略式命令を受け、その刑が確定した。このことは、建設業法第28条第１項第３号に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"Urawa Kogyo Co., Ltd. was issued a summary order on March 7, 2025, by the Okinawa Summary Court for violations of the Industrial Safety and Health Act and for professional negligence resulting in death. The violations occurred during the assembly of scaffolding over 5 meters high at a private renovation site in Okinawa City, Okinawa Prefecture, on July 4, 2024. The company failed to monitor the progress of workers' tasks and did not perform the duties of the scaffolding supervisor. Additionally, it neglected the duty to prevent electric shock accidents by installing protective pipes on high-voltage lines, failed to take necessary measures, and did not monitor the work progress. As a result, the company was fined 200,000 yen (corporate) and the individual was fined 500,000 yen, which is recognized as falling under Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Construction Business Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1944","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-pu-he-gong-ye-20260119"},{"id":"ff41ece0-6662-449d-9b74-92fd16c0dcbe","company_name":"有限会社銘苅工業","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"2360002019942","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2026-01-19","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"有限会社銘苅工業は、令和６年１月15日、沖縄県名護市の民間改修工事において、労働者を使用して建物４階から高さが１．５メートルを超える同ビル屋上塔屋周囲の足場設置作業を行わせるに当たり、当該作業に従事する労働者が安全に昇降するための設備等を設けることが作業の性質上著しく困難ではないにもかかわらず、同設備等を設けなかったとして、労働安全衛生法違反により令和７年１月６日、名護簡易裁判所より、罰金30万円（法人）、及び罰金30万円（個人）の略式命令を受け、その刑が確定した。このことは、建設業法第28条第１項第３号の規定に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"On January 15, 2024, Mearu Corporation was ordered to pay a fine of 300,000 yen (corporation) and 300,000 yen (individual) by the Nago Summary Court for violating the Industrial Safety and Health Act. The violation involved failing to install safety equipment for workers performing scaffolding work around the rooftop turret of a building during a private renovation project in Nago City, Okinawa Prefecture, despite it being not significantly difficult to do so given the nature of the work. This is recognized as corresponding to Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Construction Business Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1943","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-ming-yi-gong-ye-20260119"},{"id":"34e48b8d-70e9-4f9a-8ee7-3140c19b947a","company_name":"(株)奥浜組","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"2360001011058","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2025-07-01","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"（株）奥浜組は、令和６年２月14日の宮古島市における建築工事現場において、「請負人の労働者に、わく組足場における高さ２メートル以上の作業場所を使用させるに当たり、墜落により危険を及ぼすおそれのある箇所には、交さ筋かい（すじかい）及び高さ１５センチメートル以上４０センチメートル以下の桟（さん）若しくは高さ１５センチメートル以上の幅木（はばき）又はこれらと同等以上の機能を有する設備を設けなければならないのにこれを講じなかった」として、労働安全衛生法違反により令和７年１月７日、平良簡易裁判所より、罰金20万円（法人）、及び罰金20万円（法人役員）の略式命令を受け、その刑が確定している。 このことが、法第28条第１項第３号に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"On February 14, 2024, at a construction site in Miyakojima City, Ohamagumi Co., Ltd. was found to have violated the Industrial Safety and Health Act by failing to install necessary safety measures such as cross braces and guardrails at a work location over 2 meters high on a scaffold, which could pose a fall hazard to workers. On January 7, 2025, the Taira Summary Court issued a summary order imposing a fine of 200,000 yen on the corporation and 200,000 yen on the corporate officer, and the penalties were finalized. This is recognized as corresponding to Item 3, Paragraph 1, Article 28 of the Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1717","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-ao-bang-zu-20250701"},{"id":"c494d782-eabd-4f15-b3cc-fc4898a1eaad","company_name":"富島総業(株)","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":"7360002022470","authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"建設業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2025-07-01","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"富島総業（株）は、令和６年２月19日の宮古島市における工事現場において、「足場の組立て等を請け負う１次下請け事業者であるが、高さが２メートル以上の構造の足場の組立ての作業を行わせるに当たり、足場材の緊結、取り外し、受渡し等の作業にあっては、墜落による労働者の危険を防止するため、要求性能墜落制止用器具を使用させる措置を講じなければならないにもかかわらず、これを講じなかった」として、労働安全衛生法違反により令和７年１月７日、平良簡易裁判所より罰金20万円（法人）、罰金10万円（個人）の略式命令を受け、その刑が確定した。 このことが、法第28条第１項第３号に該当すると認められる。","violation_summary_en":"Toshima Sougyo Co., Ltd. was ordered to pay a fine of 200,000 yen (corporate) and 100,000 yen (individual) by the Taira Summary Court on January 7, Reiwa 7 (2025), for violating the Industrial Safety and Health Act. The violation occurred at a construction site in Miyakojima City on February 19, Reiwa 6 (2024), where the company, as a primary subcontractor responsible for scaffolding assembly, failed to implement measures to use fall prevention devices when assembling scaffolding structures over two meters high, thereby failing to prevent fall hazards for workers. This constitutes a violation under Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Act.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"confirmed","confidence":100,"method":"source_corporate_number_nta_current_name","notes":"国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"},"human_review_status":"machine_reviewed","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1718","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-fu-dao-zong-ye-20250701"},{"id":"4b58e2b2-a77b-4f88-b526-4468fac65338","company_name":"有限会社オキホーム","company_name_en":null,"corporate_number":null,"authority":"沖縄県","authorities":["沖縄県"],"authority_count":1,"action_types":["指示"],"regional_record_count":1,"source_document_count":1,"law_name":"宅地建物取引業法","action_type":"指示","action_date":"2025-03-31","announcement_date":"2026-04-25","violation_summary":"被処分者においては、従業者でない者が被処分者の免許名義を使用して宅地建物取引業を営んでいるかの如く名刺に記載して外部に示していることを、当該名刺を受け取った第三者からの情報提供により確認した。被処分者及び名義借用人に事実確認を行った結果、被処分者は当該名刺が使用されることを少なくとも認識していたと判断せざるを得ない。\nこのことは、法第13条第２項に違反し、法第65条第２項第２号に該当するが、本件については「当該違反行為により関係者の損害が発生せず、かつ、今後発生することが見込まれないとき」に該当すると判断できるため、法第65条第１項による指示処分とする。","violation_summary_en":"The Okinawa Prefectural Government issued an instruction to Oki Home LLC for using a business card that implied non-employee individuals were engaged in real estate transactions under the company's license, which violated Article 13, Paragraph 2, and Article 65, Paragraph 2, Item 2 of the Real Estate Business Act. However, since no damages occurred and none are expected, the measure was an instruction under Article 65, Paragraph 1.","penalty_amount":null,"is_verified":true,"record_verified":true,"entity_match":{"status":"unresolved","confidence":60,"method":"source_name_only_no_registry_match","notes":"A current-policy Corporate Number match to a verified company profile is not available."},"human_review_status":"needs_review","source_url":"https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=takuti&EID=search&no=203","url":"https://regbase.jp/enforcement/takken-gyoho-okihomu-20250331"}],"meta":{"query":null,"corporate_number":null,"law":null,"authority":"沖縄県","action_type":null,"count":10,"api_docs":"https://regbase.jp/api-docs","openapi_schema":"https://regbase.jp/api/openapi.json","llms":"https://regbase.jp/llms.txt","usage_note":"Use RegBase for targeted public-source screening of Japanese companies and enforcement records. Absence of returned records is not a clearance, legal opinion, sanctions result, or credit decision.","rate_limit":{"limit":10,"window_seconds":60,"remaining":8,"reset_at":"2026-08-10T10:51:25.304Z"},"daily_rate_limit":{"limit":300,"window_seconds":86400,"remaining":278,"reset_at":"2026-08-11T10:50:25.304Z"}}}